My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
17 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 5:17:02 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 5:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
larger grading footprint. The impact of grading of the overall Environmentally <br />Superior Alternative, however, is reduced due to the reduction of total lots than <br />the Original Project. <br />• Biological Resources -Alternative 4 improves on the Original Project by greatly <br />reducing the amount of fill placed in drainages and reducing impacts on wetlands <br />and ephemeral streams. <br />• Geology, Soils, and Seismicity -Some construction in landslide /geologically <br />unstable areas would be reduced by the removal of homesites. <br />• Traffic -Reducing the number of lots from 98 to 51 units would reduce the <br />number of average daily traffic trips from 938 to 488 or by approximately 48%. <br />The result of these reductions would be to reduce the impacts at the <br />Angela/Bernal intersection from an unacceptable LOS "E" to an acceptable LOS <br />"D" and at the Hearst Drive/Bernal Avenue intersection from LOS F to LOS E. <br />• Police and Fire Services -The Original Project proposed two EVAs to serve 98 <br />homes while Alternative 4 proposes one fire road and one all surface road (in <br />addition to Hearst Drive itself) to serve 51 homes. With the reduction in number <br />of units the Fire Department finds these provisions to be acceptable. <br />No adverse impacts were found for Alternative 4 that were not also found for the <br />Original Project. Alternative 4 would provide mitigation of impacts superior to the <br />mitigation provided by the Original Project in the area of Biological Resources because <br />the amount of fill placed in drainages is reduced and thus impacts on wetlands and <br />ephemeral streams are also reduced. Accordingly, it is found to be the Environmentally <br />Superior Alternative. <br />The No Project Alternative <br />Description <br />An EIR is required to consider a "No Project" alternative. to the case of the Oak Grove <br />Planned Unit Development, the no project scenario takes as its starting point the <br />existing planning designation applicable to the site. As described in the DEIR, the 562- <br />acre site carries two designations: On the 489 acres within the Urban Growth Boundary <br />(UGB), the designation is Rural Density Residential (RDR), which allows no more than <br />one dwelling unit per five gross acres, or 98 dwelling units. On the 73 acres outside the <br />UGB, the designation is Public Health and Safety, which allows no development other <br />than asingle-family dwelling unit on existing private lots of record. (There is no existing <br />lot of record for this area.) <br />The Oak Grove Planned Unit Development is consistent with the level of development <br />the General Plan contemplates as the Original Project proposes exactly the maximum <br />number of residential units that the General Plan allows. The No Project Alternative <br />would be a project similarly consistent with the General Plan (i.e., a residential project of <br />98 units) but possibly configured in a different manner from the Original Project. <br />Page 8 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.