17 - Laserfiche WebLink

would pay an in-lieu fee to City's Low-Income Housing Fund if the units are not provided within five years of the first final subdivision map. Development Agreement The Development Agreement would vest the entitlement set forth by the PUD development plan and conditions of approval and would incorporate, where applicable, the mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report. IV. COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES Housing Commission The Pleasanton Housing Commission heard the applicant's proposal at its public hearing held on January 18, 2007. The public hearing minutes are attached as Exhibit I-1. The Housing Commission voted to require that the 20 affordable units be produced within five years starting from approval of the final subdivision map and that the developer provide the City with an annual progress report. Parks And Recreation Commission/Trails Ad-Hoc Committee Work Session The Parks and Recreation Commission and the Trails Ad-Hoc Committee held a public work session on January 11, 2007 to discuss and make recommendations on the open space areas of the Oak Grove development: ownership, type of facilities, and timing. Minutes of the meeting are attached. The Committee and the Commission supported City ownership of the entire open space area upon recordation of the first subdivision map, supported installation of local and regional trails and a trails staging area before the sale of the fifth lot, and found that a neighborhood park would not have to be provided with this development given the open space dedication, provision of trails, and lack of a flat, five-acre site. Planning Commission The Planning Commission reviewed the Oak Grove Draft EIR at two publicly noticed work sessions held on July 12, 2006 and August 23, 2006. Minutes of the work sessions are attached and the comments are analyzed in the Final EIR. The Planning Commission then reviewed the entire Oak Grove development -Final EIR, PUD Development Plan, and Development Agreement at two public hearings held on June 13, 2007 and June 27, 2007. Minutes of the hearings are attached. As a result of the June 13, 2007 Planning Commission hearing, there were various issues that were raised about which the Planning Commission requested clarification and/or additional information. The following issues were raised by the Planning Commission based upon the public opposition to the proposal: • The EIR process and the adequacy of the studies conducted by the City's environmental consultant; • The visual analysis including ridge top development and graphic representation; • Fire response and protection issues, including adequacy of site ingress/egress; • Home size and Floor Area Ratio; Page 8 of 27