Laserfiche WebLink
• The benefits of the reductions of environmental impacts due to the reduction of <br />development density of the preferred environmental alternative from 98 lots to 51 <br />lots, <br />• The identification of feasible mitigation measures for the 51 units and <br />implemented on the development plan, in the draft conditions of approval, and in <br />the development agreement; <br />• The mitigation measures for some impacts -for example, traffic and circulation <br />and tree replacement -are based on the 98-unit plan and carried through to the <br />51-unit plan; <br />• The dedication of 496 acres of open space held in perpetuity with an easement <br />overlaid on those lands administered by an independent third party, such as the <br />Tri-Valley Conservancy; and, <br />• The proposed development will be of benefit because the project itself creates an <br />amenity not only for those residing in Southeast Pleasanton but also for residents <br />citywide. <br />Fire Safety Measures <br />The Oak Grove development is located in a dry wildland area that is currently used for <br />grazing. As mapped by the Pleasanton General Plan, the project site and adjoining <br />properties include areas designated Moderate, High, and Very High wildland fire risk by <br />the Pleasanton General Plan. Development of the proposed project will introduce <br />potential ignition sources to the project site, which would increase the potential for fires <br />in the open space areas. The homes increase the potential for a wildland fire to result <br />in property loss, injury, etc. The Draft EIR judged this impact to be significant if not <br />mitigated. <br />To mitigate this impact, the project is subject to the following measures: preparation of <br />a wildland/urban interface plan, grazing open space areas, purchase of new fire-fighting <br />equipment, residential fire sprinklers, and emergency vehicle access. These measures <br />are described in detail in the June 13t" Planning Commission staff report and are <br />reflected in the draft conditions. Further discussion of the Wildland/Urban Fire Interface <br />Plan and fire response/protection follows. <br />Wildland/Urban Fire Interface Plan <br />Public testimony questioned the ability to implement the Wildland/Urban Fire Interface <br />Plan (WFIP) in the context of the EIR's mitigation measures for Heritage Tree removal <br />and replacement -specifically the ability to plant oak trees and similar native species in <br />the area covered by the WFIP. <br />The development and implementation of a WFIP are considered effective means to <br />mitigate potential wildland fire hazards as a result of the project's development due to its <br />emphasis -reduce the potential heat output of wildland fires, design structures and <br />landscapes to increase their potential for survival when exposed to fire, make it more <br />Page 16 of 27 <br />