My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 3:23:51 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 3:23:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br />Bids were received on August 07, 2007. The apparent low bidder was N2 Electric Inc. of <br />Livermore, California, in the amount of $244,330. On August 20, 2007, N2 Electric <br />requested that they be excused from their bid due to inability to acquire the proper <br />amount of bonding for this project (N2 Electric has been in business for only 5 months). <br />Based upon their request and the circumstances regarding the lack of ability to bond the <br />project, staff recommends that N2 Electric Inc. be relieved of their bid, that their bid bond <br />be released, and the contract be awarded to the second low bidder, Dan Electric of <br />Alameda, in the amount of $249,000. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The subject project consists of improvements providing for the replacement of marginal <br />and aging dimmers and electrical distribution for theatrical lighting in the Amador <br />Theatre. After the initial lighting upgrade design was completed in 2003, the consulting <br />engineer prepared an estimate of the cost of constructing the required improvements. <br />The estimated cost of the improvements was $405,683, or about twice what was <br />budgeted for the project at that time. <br />To address this budget issue, staff evaluated the condition of the existing dimmer circuits <br />to determine if some of the old system could be utilized with the purchase of new dimmer <br />racks. However, it was determined that the old wiring system was not compatible with <br />the new state of the art dimmer racks. Additionally, this analysis found numerous code <br />violations, including many splices in the old wiring system. Staff therefore determined <br />that utilization of a part of the old lighting system was not a viable alternative and the <br />project was put on hold pending additional funding. <br />Additional funds for the dimmer system upgrade were approved in the 2007/2008 <br />Operating Budget. In addition, staff met with Zeiger Engineering, Inc. to determine if <br />there were any alternate lighting upgrade designs that might make the project more <br />affordable to construct. Zeiger Engineering suggested an alternative method for wiring <br />the dimmer racks that could be more cost effective than the method initially specified for <br />the lighting system upgrade. Staff found it to be an acceptable alternate and contracted <br />with Zeiger Engineering to revise the plans and specifications to incorporate this new <br />wiring method. <br />The revised lighting system upgrade plans and specifications were bid on August 7, <br />2007, with three bids received. The bids ranged from $244,330 to $499,000, as <br />compared to the Engineer's estimate of $450,000 for the project. (See Attachment 2 for <br />Bid Summary.) Due to the inability of the apparent low bidder to submit required <br />bonding, the second low bidder, Dan Electric, was asked to submit the required bid <br />documents. All bid documents were found to be in order and past work performed by <br />said contractor was verified to be satisfactory. <br />Since this project will be upgrading an existing system that is failing, staff recognizes the <br />potential for additional unanticipated work. Therefore, it is requested that a project <br />contingency of twenty percent of the cost of the construction contract ($48,870) be <br />applied to the project cost. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.