My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2007-33, PUD-65, KAVAYIOTIDIS
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC-2007-33, PUD-65, KAVAYIOTIDIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:37:45 AM
Creation date
8/30/2007 1:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/27/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2007-33 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF NICK <br />KAVAYIOTIDIS, PETRA REALTY INVESTORS, INC. FOR PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, <br />AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-65 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Nick Kavayiotidis, Petra Realty Investors, Inc., has applied for Planned <br />Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval to construct a <br />21,795-square-foot two-story office building at 5980 and 5998 Sunol <br />Boulevard and to rezone the property at 5998 Sunol Boulevard from the O <br />(Office) District to the PUD-O (Planned Unit Development – Office) <br />District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of June 27, 2007, the Planning <br />Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and <br />recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval for the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for this project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed rezoning and <br />development plan are appropriate for the site; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare. <br /> <br />The project would include the installation of private utility systems to serve <br />the office building. Adequate storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water <br />service utilities are present in the area surrounding the development and <br />are sufficient to serve the new building. All on-site infrastructure would be <br />installed by the project developer with connections to municipal systems in <br />order to serve the site. As conditioned, drive aisles and driveways will be <br />designed and constructed to City standards. Adequate access would be <br />provided to the structure for police, fire, and other emergency response <br />vehicles. The building would be designed to meet the requirements of the <br />Uniform Building Code and other applicable City codes. Stormwater <br />run-off from the site will be treated before leaving the site. Construction <br />hour limits and dust suppression requirements will minimize construction <br />impacts on the surrounding residents and tenants. The proposed plan is <br />in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare; <br />therefore, this finding can be made. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.