Laserfiche WebLink
... ... :.: ... Approv d as to ~r?:/x <br /> <br /> · - ~eputy County Counsel <br /> <br /> LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO, 89-9 <br /> <br /> ..... · '-':".~ ....!<~' ......~ WHEREAS, a resolution of application for Annexation No, ]26 to the <br /> ": '!!"' City of Pleasanton was heretofore filed with the Executive Officer of the <br /> ~':"':'~"'~!":'.:"-.~"'~ Local Agency Formation Commission; and <br /> <br /> · ': . ~ MHEREAS, said Executive Office~ ~as reviewed said appitcation and <br /> ~ prepared a report, ~ncludtng his recommendations thereon, noting that a <br /> "".'~'!f~"'~?]"""' Negative Declaration has been prepared and said applicatlon and Negative <br /> · .;; ~L. ~ Declaration have been considered by this Commission;. ~nd <br /> <br /> .:-.:-". -~',.~.. WHEREAS, said Negative Declaration is adequate for consideration of <br /> this proposal; and <br /> <br /> ..'. , , "- - WHEREAS, the City and County have agreed on the property tax <br /> .-"' "' exchange; the area is uninhabited and within the Sphere of Influence of the <br /> ~ City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the area is uninhabited and within the Sphere of Influence <br /> of the City of Pleasanton; the area is not within an agricultural preserve; <br /> and the property owner has consented to the annexation; and <br /> <br /> ~HEREAS, at the hearing on March 16, 1989, the Local Agency <br /> "'.'<"'°~Y'~'~"""'! Formation Commission heard and received all oral and written protests, <br /> objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons <br /> present were given an opportunity to appear and be heard in respect to any <br /> matter relating to said application and report; and <br /> <br /> · . WHEREAS, this Commission did find as follows: <br /> <br /> 1, The proposal is consistent with the procedures and policies previously <br /> adopted by the Commission. <br /> <br /> 2. The annexation will permit the provision of municipal services to the <br /> subject area. <br /> <br /> 3.' Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Negative <br /> Declaration has been adopted by the City of PleasantOn as lead agency, and <br /> said Negative Declaration has been considered by the Commission; and <br /> <br /> 4. No significant impacts or mitigation measures of concern as a responsible <br /> agency were identified in the Negative Declaration. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT: <br /> <br /> Annexation No, 126 to the City of Pleasanton be approved subJec't to the <br /> following terms: <br /> <br /> i, Correction of the map and description as may be requ~rea by ~he'Director <br /> of Public WorKs, ex-officto County Surveyor; and <br /> <br /> 2, The City be authorized to proceed without notice or hearing. <br /> <br /> I CERTIPf THAT THE FOREGOING IS A <br /> Cp~CT COPY OF ~. RESOLUTION A- <br /> <br /> -' ." 'i:C2:' ~A 3/16/89 ~ - <br /> 6977i BRUC~ KERN, LA~CO <br /> <br /> <br />