Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT " <br />Z-84-129 <br />1. That the development be subste <br />plan, elevations, floor plans, <br />Exhibit A, on file with the P] <br />2. That the 5 ft, wide landscape <br />property line shall be widenec <br />of the adjacent parking space; <br />providing for a 2 ft, front o~ <br />this manner the planter would <br />trees. <br />3. That all parking lot aisles sY <br />25 ft. in width. <br />4. That if it is determined at a <br />parking is needed for the dewe <br />provide such parking in the un <br />of the hotel at the time requi <br />5. That glass reinforced precast <br />in the building rather than ac <br />6. That the developer enter into <br />City to enter into an assessme <br />for the construction of all of <br />for the amelioration of traffi <br />by development of the subject <br />may be those discussed in the <br />Studies, or other facilities d <br />The agreement shall be entered <br />of a building permit on the su <br />7. That prior to the issuance of <br />subject property the developer <br />in the funding of) a comprehen <br />Pleasanton area to identify sh <br />necessary to achieve adequate <br />In order to achieve timely com <br />ments concurrent with the deve <br />site, the developer shall ente <br />pay his appropriate share of t <br />facilities necessary to serve <br />or made necessary due to the c <br />of the north Pleasanton area. <br />made via reimbursement agreeme <br />or benefit districts as best m <br />City and developer. The metho <br />be decided and entered into wh <br />by the City Engineer and/or th <br /> <br />~ tiall a <br />s how <br />Y S <br />III '' <br />n <br />sections arld 1 ~ sc <br />nning Division. ', <br />lanter along th i no e <br />to 7 ft. by red in h <br />from 19 ftJ~ to f ' a <br />rhang for auto it <br />e wide enough ac <br />11 be a minimu f <br />ater date that di ~ n <br />opment, the' dev 'I op I s <br />eveloped area t I th ' e <br />ed by the City. i' <br />oncrete panels al e <br />ylic plaster or cr c <br />n agreement. wit I th <br />In <br />t district pr d tr' s <br />the facilities ce r <br />congestion'cau d 'i <br />roperty. These ac' t <br />orth Pleasanton ) ra c <br />erred necessary t C <br />into prior to t is a: <br />ject property. <br />building permi l~, on l e <br />shall fund '(or rti ' p. <br />ive water study f t <br />rt and long~ter imp v~ <br />ater supply and ! res r~ <br />letion of such pro - <br />opment of the s jec <br />into an agxeem t t <br />e cost of the w er <br />he subject prop ty <br />mulative deraelo ent <br />Improvements ma be <br />ts, assessment str ' c~ t <br />ets the needs o the <br />of implemey~tat n s <br />. <br />n determined ne ssa IV! <br />City Attorney. ' <br /> a <br />site <br />plan, <br />rn <br />e width <br />nd <br />In <br />date <br />~1 <br />gall <br />~t <br />used <br />stucco. <br />ies <br />Lty . <br />is e <br />ate <br />forth <br />:ments <br />