2479 - Laserfiche WebLink

June 13, 1984 T0: FRO?L• SUBJECT: MEMORANDUPI Planning•Commission Engineering Services - City Engineer Staff Report for Tentative Map Tract Del Prado This development is recommended for approval subject to fd cjing conditions: 1. That the developer meet all requirements of the Swbd isi0' I~'dinance of the City of Pleasanton. 2. That the developer meet all required conditions of a Yov$ I £ the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California. 3. That the developer meet all required conditions of a prii ~pprovals which this development may have received from the City df @asa tt. 4. That a separate water meter be provided to each lpt ret'' 'within the developmentunless otherwise approved by the City $n i per_ ~ '~, 5. That a separate sanitary sewer lateral be providedl Co each, ~ of record within the development unless otherwise approved by t ~ C,~i ngineer. That in-lieu park dedication fees be collected by t 6 jCit~y r iot to approval . of the final map at the rate then in effect and for le t0 1 number of logs in the final map, unless this requirement has iri dt ise satisfied. 7, That any existing assessment district, which the pr irty~ be subject ill to, be cleared prior to the approval of the final m orl ~ developer w l ma fi ause a segregation to be completed in conjunction h ~ !, p. na c ~ That the developer submit a refundable cash bond ~,fo 8 az~. ' ontrol prior . to approval of the final map. The amount of this'I b w~ a determined by the City Engineer. (Approximately $100 per 1d,t_ $25 nimum.) That the developer grant an easement to the City!iov 9 !,thrD ~' arcels shown . as public service easements (P.S.E.) and which atte ropy ~ y the City i E Engineer or other parcels which may be designated b he, I neer. ng That approval of the design for the Line, grade,',an 10 $tr~ al sections . for the streets serving this development be with11e1 pen$ final engineering design and review by the City Engineer. That the paving sections for the on-site parking'~,a 11 d ~iri ~ I eas be designed . on the basis of an R-Value test and a traffic inde ~ c the anticipated traffic loads. This design shall be subject to $p ual'i he City Engineer. The minimum paving section shall be 2" A.C. on 6{' ' Y1.BI• '~ h minimum A.C. the surface 17 ,o pavement slope shall be 1%. For pavement slopes a ess , Kept a 1 . oint of discharge. n runoff shall be carried in a concrete gutter to p The minimum slope for concrete. gutter shall be OLS . a.' Y ~, IC ._. _. _ L, ~ I .. a ___~ ~.-