My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
082107
>
16 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2007 11:27:16 AM
Creation date
8/6/2007 3:28:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENT 5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Ms. Stern indicated that two new land use designations are being proposed: <br />(1) Mixed-Used, which would allow any combination of Business Park, Office Retail, <br />Research and Development, Public and Institutional, and Residential uses in a single <br />building or site where uses are integrated as a cohesive project; live-work units are also <br />accommodated in this use; and (2) Water Management and Resources, which is proposed <br />for the lake areas in East Pleasanton acquired by Zone 7 and would allow for water <br />storage, recharge, storm water management, and limited recreation. <br />Chairperson Fox inquired if mixed-use development would have to be near or within the <br />proximity of a transit site or is independent of its location in relation to BART or ACE <br />Transit. <br />Ms. Stern replied it is not a requirement for mixed-use development to be located <br />adjacent to BART or other similar high transit where high-density housing is encouraged; <br />mixed-use development could potentially by located in some other area that is not next to <br />a public transit station. She pointed out, for example, that mixed-use development could <br />be located in Downtown Pleasanton, although that use is not being designated there as the <br />Downtown Specific Plan already allows that in the area. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that Policy 13 on page 2-29 states that mixed-use <br />development would be located by public transit, but the introduction to the Mixed Use <br />section on page 2-20 does not mention that requirement. She added that the Downtown <br />area east of Main Street is not close to any form of public transportation system such as <br />the ACE Train. She stated that this inconsistency is confusing and recommended that <br />more specific language be used with respect to whether or not such location near a public <br />transit is required. <br />Commissioner O'Connor observed that Mixed Use as a land use designation had to be <br />near public transit but that mixed-use development can occur in an area not designated as <br />Mixed Use. He noted that Spring Street has amixed-use development but is not a <br />designated Mixed Use area. <br />Ms. Stern confirmed Commissioner O'Connor's observation. She added that she would <br />clarify the matter further when Policy 13 is discussed. <br />Ms. Stern then indicated the proposed Land Use Map changes as follows: <br />• BART Station at Stoneridge Mall Road, from Commercial to Mixed Use; <br />• Hacienda Business Park, from Business Park to Mixed Use, except for the <br />residential areas that already exist there; <br />• East Bay Regional Park District property on Foothill Road, for a strip on the <br />Garms Ranch, from Public and Institutional to Park and Recreation; <br />• Applied Biosystems on Sunol, from General and Light Industrial to Business <br />Park; <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2007Page 3 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.