2392 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION N0. 2392 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AND THE CITY OF PLEASANTON CONCERNING THE HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK AS GENERALLY FILED UNDER CASE PUD-81-30 WHEREAS, Prudential Insurance Company of America has applied for a Development Agreement for a 573 acre "business park" to include approximately 23 net acres of "garden" offices, 62 net acres of general offices, 50 net acres of "mid-rise" offices, 47 net acres of industrial/warehousing, 273 net acres of research and development/light manufacturing, and 38 acres of retail commercial/financial development with the remaining approximately 80 acres to be used for street and flood channel right-of-way purposes, to be located on the east side of Hopyard Road between the Arroyo Mocho and a point approximately 1400 feet south of I-580 and extending east to the tracks of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company; and WHEREAS, under the proposed development agreement, the City would continue to have discretionary design review approval of buildings within Hacienda Business Park, including the right to require mitigations reasonably related to the particular site under consideration. However, the City would not be able to exercise such discretion in a manner which would materially interfere with the development of the property for the uses and to the density and intensity set forth in the PUD. Additionally, the City would still have .discretion to reasonably determine that the effects of the Hacienda Business Park require further mitigation measures than required under case PUD-81-30; and WHEREAS, the proposed development agreement would lock in, for a period of 25 years, the uses, height, density and intensity set forth in PUD-81-30 and allowed under the "Industrial, Commercial and Offices" land use designa on of the general plan. Changes could be made with regard to the local rules and regulations governing the development to the extent that they do not materially interfere with those uses and to the density 2nd intensity as set forth in the PUD; and WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of November 21, 1983 the Planning Commission considered all public input, related exhibits and recommendations of the City Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the proposed development agreement to be in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Pleasanton; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the readoption of case PUD-81-30. For this reason, no environmental document accompanied this application.