My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2394
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
2394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:47 AM
Creation date
7/31/2007 11:10:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/21/1983
DOCUMENT NO
2394
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-80-22
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 2
MAJOR INDUSTIRAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING TRAFFIC
NOTES 3
PLEASANTON
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. 2394 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY <br />OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING A CHANGE TO CONDITION <br />N0. 56 OF ORDINANCE N0. 1014 FOR THE 91 ACRE SITE <br />LOCATED NORTH OF STONERIDGE DRIVE BETWEEN STONERIDGE <br />MALL ROAD AND I-680 AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-81-22 <br />WHEREAS, in order to treat the major industrial commercial developments within the <br />City of Pleasanton equally concerning traffic level of service as it relates <br />to mitigation measures, the City Council initiated a change to the ordinance <br />as it relates to case PUD-81-22; and <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of November 21, 1983, the Planning <br />Commission reviewed the proposed wording of the proposed ordinance change; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the City staff has recommended to the Planning Commission that the wording <br />on Exhibit "A" be incorporated inito project conditions of approval for <br />the business park herein described; and <br />WHEREAS, the wording recommended incorporates the desires of the General Plan Review <br />Committee as stated at the duly noticed public hearing of the Planning <br />Commission on October 26, 1983 with regard to Hacienda Business Park <br />" consisderation; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that all developments should be treated equally. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: <br />Section 1. Recommends that Condition No. 56 of Ordinance No. 1014 be changed to <br />read as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and inicorporated herein by <br />reference. <br />Section 2. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and <br />adoption. <br />PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ON THE 21ST <br />DAY OF NOVEMBER 1983 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Arrigoni, Doherty, Gett <br />NOES: None y, and Chairman Jamieson <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Lindsey and Wilson <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />DATE: November 21, 1983 <br />ATTEST: <br />Robert J. H is, Secretary <br />APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br />Brian W. Swift, Assi tant <br />City Attorney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.