My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 07147
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
RES 07147
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2007 1:09:28 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 1:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2007
DOCUMENT NO
RES 07147
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~~.~ <br />MACRO <br />co~poratlon <br />>» <br />A KEMA Company <br />May 17, 2007 <br />James Piper, Assistant City Manager <br />City Manager's Office <br />1052 South Livermore Ave. <br />Livermore, CA 94550 <br />Re: Development of Additional Alternatives under Task 2 <br />Dear Mr. Piper: <br />Following the presentation of our Task 2 report on May 7th, the two cities requested further <br />development of three possible radio system alternatives in addition to those provided in our <br />Task 2 efforts. <br />These new alternatives were as follows: <br />New Alternative 1 - "Quick Fix" (replace/refurbish oldest system components; reuse <br />remaining) <br />New Alternative 2 - `Quick Fix" with recommended coverage improvements <br />(improves coverage in Springtown and southwest Pleasanton) <br />New Alternative 3 -Replacement System, with migration path to earlier Task Z <br />Alternative B/C (also improves coverage in Springtown and southwest Pleasanton) <br />New Alternative 3 would be similar to the earlier Task 2 Alternative A (Status Quo), but <br />would design the system to permit integration with the EBRCS at some future time. Specific <br />activities would include: <br />(a) Identification of a common tower site location that could improve coverage in <br />Southwest Pleasanton as well as support the area currently served by the proposed <br />EBRCS site at the Sunol CDF Fire Station; <br />(b) Estimate costs for a new tower and shelter there; and <br />(c) Describe the steps and process necessary to implement New Alternative 3 should <br />the cities decide on this direction. <br />1 177 l~;lk'dflc: B~'i~l J•11 ~=~ ~~~ ~ ~i`/alllUl ~.(~@K ~ 1. ~)-~J~~b '~1')'~ ~ri~ 1711'1 FnX 'a )~j.71•). 1h ~p A~:CS~I':. .Y.V 1'I .~'.~f;17 •a.Jltl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.