Laserfiche WebLink
- Policy 28: To work closely with all agencies responsible for <br />making decisions which affect the air quality of the <br />Amador-Livermore Valley to ensure that solutions are found <br />which would improve the air quality of the valley. <br />While the major solutions to the air quality problem must be regional <br />or technological in nature, Pleasanton can take steps to improve its <br />air quality. Air quality is directly related to the number of vehicle <br />miles travelled. Steps taken to reduce the use of vehicles or to <br />reduce the length of trips reduce the .emissions of the precursors of <br />oxidant and, thus, reduce the amount of oxidant which may be formed. <br />Sound planning at the local level can place residential dwellings close <br />enough to shopping and mass transit routes to reduce vehicle trip <br />length and encourage the use of alternative, non-vehicular modes of <br />travel. <br />Policy 29: To encourage development in locations convenient <br />to shopping and mass transit and to encourage the pro- <br />vision of features in residential development which <br />facilitate non-vehicular transportation means. <br />Agricultural Land - Far more land is planned for ultimate residential <br />use than will be developed in the next five, ten, or fifteen years. <br />Much of this land is excellent agricultural land which has been made <br />tenuously profitable, if at all, by the developmental pressures placed <br />upon it and the resultant tax increases. Still, the larger tracts of <br />agricultural land are being used to produce crops, typically through <br />lease arrangements which do not bring the landowner enough revenue _ <br />to cover the taxes. The harsh fact is that most of the planned :resi- <br />dential land will not develop for many years; thus, either the agri- <br />culturally usable land will be developed while the non-agriculturally <br />usable vacant areas of the city sit empty for. up to twenty years, <br />or the unproductive areas will develop while the agriculturally Ras able <br />land continues to produce crops if not profits. There is little to <br />choose from a logical developmental standpoint between the two glasses <br />of lands - all those areas within the Urbanization Line can be about <br />equally well accommodated with public facilities. In some cases, <br />development of agriculturally usable lands caould be "beneficial" from <br />a capital improvement viewpoint; in others, it would not be especially <br />beneficial. The choice of whether to develop such land is up to the <br />landowner. Tax relief through use of the 6illiamson Act Land Preserve <br />mechanism. is possible., but it imposes a penalty in the form of man, <br />dating a postponement of possible development. The 13ndocaner is in <br />the best position to judge whether to opt for deferring development. <br />For those wishing to defer development to the later years of the <br />20 year planning period, the Williamson Act should be made a possible <br />option. <br />Policy 30: To adopt Williamson Act procedures and enter <br />Land Preserve contracts with those landowners wishing <br />to enter such contracts. <br />-19- <br />