Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. 2180 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY <br />OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION FOR CASE PUD-81-36 <br />WHEREAS, Castlewood Properties, Inc., Everette and Dixie Kamp, <br />Merle and Paul Kral and Helen Crouch have applied for <br />rezoning to allow a phased mixed density residential <br />project on approximately 58 acres of land located at <br />the northeast corner of Oakland and Mohr Avenues; and <br />WHEREAS, the property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development)- <br />Medium Density Residential District; and <br />WHEREAS, at their meeting of June 24, 1982 the Planning Commission <br />received a proposed negative declaration for case PUD-81-36; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the <br />Initial Study dated 1/19/82 and received a recommendation <br />of the staff; and <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on June 24, 1982 <br />and the public was given the opportunity to comment on <br />the environmental impacts of the proposed rezoning in case <br />PUD-81-36; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential impacts <br />in accordance with the applicable state and local guide- <br />lines governing the preparation of negative declarations <br />and environmental impact reports; and <br />WHEREAS, the Initial Study prepared by the City staff indicated <br />that there would not be any significant impacts upon <br />the environment by approving the rezoning and recommended <br />adoption of the Negative Declaration prepared for this case. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission finds that based upon the review <br />of the Initial Study and the testimony documentary evidence <br />presented at the public hearing that there will be no <br />significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result <br />of the rezoning as described in case PUD-81-36. <br />