2184 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item 6b item Sa Staff Report Staff Report PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION March 10, 1982 March 31, 1982 SUBJECT; PUD-82-1 APPLICANT: Reynolds and Brown PURPOSE: Application for development plan approval for the balance of the Reynolds and Brown site located on the south side of Johnson Drive approximately 700 ft. west of Hopyard Road. The property is zoned PUD-Industrial, Commercial and Offices. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. Development Plan, Exhibit A 3. Letter from TJKM dated 3/1/82 4. Conditions Attached to PUD-80-14 The southwestern corner of fhe Reynolds and Brown property received PUD development plan approval early in 1981 (case PUD-80-14). The remaining approximately two-thirds of the site received only PUD zoning at that time. Reynolds and Brown have now submitted a development plan for the balance of the property. The new development plan covers all but the southwestern sector of the property. Fourteen (14) separate buildings are shown. One of these (project number 130) is a redesign of a building approved under the previous development plan. Reynolds and Brown has revised their thinking with regard to land use on the subject property. All the buildings shown are either office, research and development or combination office and research and development structures. Initially, the applicants had considered commercial uses in the northwestern sector of the property. No com- mercial uses are now being proposed. Another change is that one of the buildings is five-stories in height and another four-stories. Previously Reynolds and Brown had indicated that they were not interested in anything over three stories. A condition of approval of the overall PUD on the Reynolds and Brown site was that the maximum floor area ratio of any building within a particular site could not exceed 408, while the overall building floor area ratio of all structures in the development could not exceed 338. Reynolds and Brown contend that their new plan conforms to this requirement. However, they conform to the overall 33~ floor area ratio only if street rights-of~way are counted as part of the project. This is normally not the practice in calculating basic floor area ratio. $owever, all of Reynolds and Brown previously submitted plans for individual buildings show