My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2034
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
2034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:06 AM
Creation date
7/24/2007 9:48:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/1981
DOCUMENT NO
2034
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-80-14
NOTES
REYNOLDS AND BROWN
NOTES 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 60 ACRE
NOTES 3
W. OF HOPYARD RD. FOR MOST SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. 2034 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING A <br />MINOR MODIFICATION TO CASE PUD-80-14, REYNOLDS AND <br />BROWN. <br />WHEREAS, Reynolds and Brown has development plan approval for a <br />60 acre site located immediately south of Johnson Drive <br />and approximately 700 feet west of Hopyard Road for the <br />most southwesterly portion of the property; and <br />WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval of that PUD is that <br />all buildings in the development be a minimum of 40 ft. <br />apart; and <br />WHEREAS, the plans submitted by Reynolds and Brown for design review <br />approval show three buildings which would be a minimum of <br />30 ft, apart; and <br />WHEREAS, normally such a modification is handled administratively <br />with notification going to the Planning Commission and <br />City Council, however, for ease of processing this case, <br />it was submitted to the Planning Commission for action <br />with notification to the City Council; and <br />WHEREAS, the plans submitted by Reynolds and Brown under case Z-81-68 <br />show a 30 ft. separation between the three buildings because <br />it is the best architectural solution for the project; and <br />WHEREAS, the 40 ft. separation couli3 be maintained by combining four <br />of the buildings into two separate structures, however, the <br />result of this would be a poor overall site design. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission approves the minor modification <br />to case PUD-80-14 as requrested but that this modification <br />does not pertain to the rest of the business park and <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />1. That this minor modification to case PUD-80-14 is <br />only to allow a 30 ft. setback between buildings A_, <br />B, C and D as shown on the site plan for case <br />Z-81-68. <br />2. That approval of this minor modification is <br />conditioned upon the approval of case Z-81-68 <br />and any conditions which may be attached thereto <br />by the Design Review Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.