2756 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 2756 February 12, 1986 Page 2 g.3 Finding. The No project Alternative, Mixed Use Alternative and Reduced Intensity Alternative, which could partially mitigate or delay impact, are infeasible. g.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of these alternatives). II. Employment/Demographics/Housin . A. Significant Effect. Growth in employment capacity in the Tri-Valley Area resulting in increased need for housing and associated impacts (noise, traffic, air quality, public service, etc.). a.l See Section I F. III. Transportation and Circulation. A. Significant Effect. Increase in traffic in the Pleasanton area at buildout of either Scenario 1 or 2. a.l Finding. Mitigation measures incorporated into the Project or agreed to by Developer will substantially lessen the effect of traffic. a.2 Fact. The Developer shall participate in Pleasanton's TSM Ordinance, traffic studies, and in-Project private shuttle service which will substantially lessen the effect of increased traffic. a.3 Fact. The Project will sponsor business park shuttles from BART to the Park. a.4 Fact. Condition No. 16 requires the City to (i) stop development if any affected intersection, as defined by the PUD, exceeds LOS E and (ii) prohibit further development until appropriate traffic mitigation is under construction. a.5 Finding. Construction and improvement of Pleasanton's circulation system will substantially lessen the effect of increased traffic. a.6 Fact. The City has created and is forming the NPID traffic districts to complete major circulation system improvements. Other improvements are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program. All local circulation systems shown on Figure 16 are funded except Stoneridge extension to E1 Charro, E1 Charro, Rose Avenue and portions of Del Valle Parkway and Bernal Avenue. a.7 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Mixed Use Alternative and the Reduced Intensity Alternative,