2756 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 2756 February 12, 1986 Page 2 If inadequate water supply exists, growth will not occur. The responsibility for providing water and ensuring water conservation is agencies with no jurisdiction over the Project. b.2 Fact. EBMUD jurisdiction does not extend into Pleasanton. b.3 Finding. Additional mitigation measures identified in the EIR (American River or other supply sources, EBMUD/CCWD joint operation) are not within the jurisdiction of the City but are within the jurisdiction of other public agencies and can and should be adopted. b.4 Fact. EBMUD has on-going litigation that will resolve its rights in the American River. EBMUD is also investigating the possiblilty of operating with the Contra Costa Water District. (CCWD). b.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use Alternative, which could partially mitigate the significant effect, are infeasible. b.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of alternatives). C. Significant Effect. Generation of wastewater flow to be treated at the DSRSD treatment plant beyond current capacity. c.l Finding. Treatment plant expansion will substantially lessen this impact. c.2 Fact. DSRSD has prepared a master plan for expansion. Expansion is economically feasible. c.3 Finding. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use Alternative, which could partially mitigate the potential significant effect, are infeasible. c.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of alternatives). D. Significant Effect. Generation of wastewater beyond current and planned capacity for disposal. d.l Finding. Implementation of an interim solution to add 4.4 MGD to the LAVWMA system should provide sufficient wastewater capacity through 1991. d.2 Fact. The LAVWMA export capacity will be expanded to 21 MGD.