My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2002 FEBRUARY
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENTS
>
2002 FEBRUARY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2009 2:05:41 PM
Creation date
7/13/2007 4:14:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
CODE SUPPLEMENTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/1/2002
DOCUMENT NO
2002 FEBRUARY
DOCUMENT NAME
SUPPLEMENT NO 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.60.060 <br />1. The park owner's operating ex- <br />penses and real property taxes in the <br />base year were unusually high or low in <br />comparison to other years. In such in- <br />stances adjustments may be made in <br />calculating such expenses so the base <br />year of operating expenses reflects <br />average expenses for the park over a <br />reasonable period of time. The follow- <br />ing factors shall be considered in mak- <br />ing this decision: <br />a. The park owner made substantial <br />capital improvements during the base <br />year which were not reflected in the <br />rent levels. <br />b. Substantial repairs were made due <br />to damage caused by natural disaster, <br />vandalism or other unusual cause. <br />c. Other expenses were unreasonably <br />high or low due to unusual circum- <br />stances, notwithstanding prudent busi- <br />ness practices. <br />2. The gross income during the base <br />year was significantly lower than nor- <br />mal because of destruction of the pre- <br />mises and/or temporary eviction for <br />construction or repairs, or other special <br />circumstances. <br />F. Schedule Of Increases In Operat- <br />ing Expenses And Real Property Taxes: <br />Where the schedule of rent increases or <br />other calculations require projections of <br />a prior year's income and expenses, it <br />shall be presumed, subject to rebuttal, <br />that operating expenses, exclusive of <br />property taxes and management expens- <br />es, increased at the cost of living, that <br />property taxes increased at two percent <br />(2%) per year, and that management <br />expenses are five percent (5%) of gross <br />income. <br />G. Authorized Adjustments: The <br />hearing officer shall grant an increase <br />to a park owner in excess of that al- <br />lowed by section 6.60.040 of this chap- <br />ter if the hearing officer finds and <br />determines that it is necessary to pro- <br />vide the park owner with a net oper- <br />ating income, after adjustment for one <br />hundred percent (100%) of the increase <br />in the cost of living, equal to the net <br />operating income realized for the park <br />during the base year. The percentage <br />rent increase needed to cover increases <br />in operating expenses and real property <br />taxes shall be calculated in the follow- <br />ing manner which is structured to per- <br />mit growth of the net operating income <br />of the park and to provide a fair and <br />reasonable return on investment based <br />upon objective standards: <br />1. For 2002, adjust the base year net <br />operating income by adding thereto one <br />hundred percent (100%) of the cost of <br />living; subtract therefrom the 2001 net <br />operating income; and divide by the <br />2001 gross rents. <br />2. For 2003 and thereafter, adjust the <br />base year net operating income by add- <br />ing thereto one hundred percent (100%) <br />of the increase in the cost of living; <br />subtract therefrom the current year net <br />operating income; and divide by the <br />current year gross rents. <br />H. Return On Investment: It is pre- <br />sumed subject to rebuttal that this for- <br />mula will provide a fair and reasonable <br />return on investment. The park owner <br />may establish by clear and convincing <br />evidence that this formula will not <br />provide a fair and reasonable return on <br />investment, and that an alternative <br />192-51 (Pleasanton February 2002) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.