Laserfiche WebLink
3.40.055 <br />Until paid in full, the amount of reim- <br />bursement that subsequent funding de- <br />velopers owe shall be increased (or de- <br />creased) annually on January 1 by the <br />most recent CPI increase (or decrease). <br />C. Should an individual funding devel- <br />oper install, or agree to install, basic <br />infrastructure improvements, the cost <br />(verified or estimated) of which exceeds <br />that funding developer's azea development <br />impact fees associated with its develop- <br />ment, then any property owner (other than <br />a subsequent funding developer) shall pay <br />the azea development impact fee as pro- <br />vided herein and that fee shall be used to <br />reimburse the funding developer. If more <br />than one funding developer is entitled to <br />reimbursement, the reimbursement shall <br />be split proportionately based on the <br />number of funding developers' lots. <br />D. If a funding developer is entitled to <br />reimbursement, either by a subsequent <br />funding developer or by a property own- <br />er, prior to the construction costs being <br />verified as provided in subsection E of <br />this Section, then the reimbursement shall <br />be based on the engineer's estimate of <br />such costs as set forth in the technical <br />report. <br />1. Should the verified construction <br />costs be higher than the engineer's esti- <br />mate, the funding developer shall be <br />entitled to recover additional amounts <br />from any subsequent funding developer <br />who has paid the funding developer as <br />provided in subsection B of this Section; <br />should the verified construction costs be <br />less than the engineer's estimate, the <br />funding developer shall refund any money <br />to any subsequent funding developer who <br />has paid the funding developer as pro- <br />91 <br />vided in subsection B of this Section; <br />2. Should the verified construction <br />costs be higher than the engineer's esti- <br />mate, the funding developer shall not be <br />entitled to recover additional amounts <br />from any property owner who has reim- <br />bursed the funding developer as provided <br />in subsection C of this Section; should the <br />verified construction costs be less than the <br />engineer's estimate, the funding developer <br />shall have no obligation to refund any <br />money to any property owner who has <br />akeady reimbursed the funding developer <br />as provided in subsection C of this Sec- <br />tion. <br />E. Construction costs shall be verified <br />as follows: within sixty (60) days after a <br />cert~cate of completion for the improve- <br />ments has been filed, the funding devel- <br />oper or property owner who has installed <br />the improvements shall present to the City <br />Engineer a statement of the actual costs <br />of the construction, including reasonable <br />costs of financing the improvements, and <br />related items ("statement of costs"). The <br />City Engineer shall have the right to <br />review all records and invoices related to <br />the facilities to verify the statement of <br />costs. If the City Engineer determines that <br />any costs submitted aze not appropriate, <br />or are unreasonable, the City Engineer <br />shall provide written notice of that deci- <br />sion to deny such costs. If agreement on <br />the statement of costs cannot be resolved <br />to the satisfaction of both the City Engi- <br />neer and the funding developer or proper- <br />ty owner, the City Manager shall make <br />the final determination as to the statement <br />of costs. (Ord. 1772 § 3, 1999) <br />(Pleasanton 5-99) <br />