My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 122706
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 122706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:34 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:14:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/27/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 122706
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Mr. Frost commented that his problem concerning the noise nuisance is that he never knows <br />when the sports court will be used and that whenever it is used, it impacts whatever he is doing. <br />He added that frequency is not necessarily the issue but the impact of any individual event, <br />which affects his quality of life and property values. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank moved to refer the item back to staff for further refinement, to be <br />brought back to the Commission for another work session. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fos, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />The motion carried. <br />b. PR~37, City of Pleasanton <br />Consideration of amendments to the Pleasanton Municipal Code to modify where <br />schools, tutoring, and recreational facilities aze allowed to be located and to allow these <br />types of uses as permitted uses in many districts, if certain criteria are met. <br />Ms. Decker requested the Commission to consider discussing this item as a work session rather <br />than as a public hearing item. <br />Commissioner Blank moved that Item 6.6., PRZ-37, City of Pleasanton (Conditional Use <br />Permits) be considered as a work session instead of as a public hearing item. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that there did not appeaz to be any controversy regazding this <br />Code amendment, and he thought that this was a matter the Commission could vote on at this <br />meeting. He inquired why staff is requesting it to be a work session. <br />Ms. Decker replied that there were some issues that staff had been deliberating on and that due to <br />the holidays have not had sufficient opportunity to discuss with interest groups that may be <br />affected by the Code amendment. She noted that staff is working at streamlining this process to <br />make it anover-the-counter approval for applications with 25 students or less. She added that <br />there were also other primary issues for which she would like the Commission's input. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 27, 2006 Page 12 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.