Laserfiche WebLink
f. Adoption of Planning Commission Schedule of Meeting Dates <br />Commissioner Pearce thanked staff for not holding a meeting on Rosh Hashanah <br />Chairperson Fox suggested not holding meetings during spring break and suggested moving the <br />April 11, 2007, meeting. <br />Ms. Decker recommended deferring that decision until the date came closer and recalled that a <br />quorum had been available. <br />Chairperson Fox noted that November 14, 2007 had been listed twice. <br />Ms. Decker noted that the calendaz would be adjusting accordingly. <br />Commissioner Peazce inquired whether the meeting would not conflict with the California <br />Planners Institute. <br />Commissioner Blank believed that additional meetings should be considered so that the <br />workload could be addressed. <br />Chairperson Fox understood that people were rushing their applications through prior to the <br />General Plan completion in the event they may be downzoned. <br />Commissioner Blank understood that concern but added that the City Council had the authority <br />to approve an item that was not in the General Plan. <br />Ms. Decker noted that the notice for the December 27, 2006 meeting had been placed in the <br />newspaper. She noted that a conditional use permit fora 15-student private school was placed <br />on the Consent Calendaz. Under Public Hearings, there were two Code amendments that she <br />considered benign, one of which was speazheaded by former Chair Arkin. The other item <br />addressed sports courts. <br />9. COMMiINICATIONS <br />Chairperson Fox inquired about the Paseo Navarro legal memo regazding the lazge family day <br />care and inquired whether the memo could be distributed to the Commission. Ms. Decker <br />believed it was a judgment and noted that minutes were not taken for that meeting. She <br />described the timing of the events that had taken place with respect to this item and noted that the <br />court upheld the Planning Commission's original decision. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the City Council had overturned the Planning Commission's <br />decision. <br />10. REFERRALS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINiJTES December 13, 2006 Page 25 of 26 <br />