My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121306
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 121306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:28 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/13/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 121306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
this for a fact. When I go to turn on Valley from Kolln, I am faced with a long line of <br />commuters heading towazds Santa Rita. They aze all coming from Livermore. Unless I <br />get really aggressive, I cannot get onto Valley until the signal light changes. Once on <br />Valley, the traffic is so bad that getting across Santa Rita takes up to three cycles of the <br />signal light. <br />"In the evening, we sometimes have to go east on Valley, getting out of Orloff onto Kolln <br />can be a real pain because commuters are sometimes stacked up beyond Orloff waiting to <br />turn onto Valley. This makes getting onto Kolln difficult - we have to wait through one <br />or two cycles to get onto Valley once we get onto Kolln. Once on Valley headed east, we <br />aze faced with a long, long line of cars waiting to turn on Stanley and get to Livermore. <br />That intersection was rated a "D" two yeazs ago, and obviously it's worse now. <br />"I do not know how you could put in a Home Depot, Longs, drive-through Starbucks, <br />several retail outlets and still say that traffic levels will remain at a "D". It's not logical, <br />even with the modifications you plan for Valley and Stanley. As I see it, there's only one <br />cure for the load of traffic we have on Valley and Santa Rita -this is traffic that has an <br />imprisoning effect on our children. That would be to open what has been promised to us <br />for years, and has been reneged on by some members of the Council. This is something <br />that was used to push through development in the Stoneridge azea. This is something that <br />was planned for and disclosed to all residents who purchased homes azound Stoneridge. <br />I'm talking about the El Charro extension to Stanley, and the Stoneridge extension to EI <br />Charro. <br />"This was promised to the residents of Pleasanton and ripped out from under us by the <br />City Council. This was done under feaz of creating "cut-through traffic." The City's <br />own data has shown that there is no cut-through traffic, The Mayor fears that they will <br />create amini-580 by opening the Stoneridge extension. If she wants to see amini-580, <br />she should try driving down Santa Rita and Valley on several occasions. We need relief. <br />She can't fix it by fixing the freeways in 10 years. The Stoneridge extension is the only <br />solution that will balance the traffic load on this side of Pleasanton and restore faith in the <br />City Council. If you want your Home Depot and associated development, then solve our <br />traffic problem first. Right now, we are stuck with noise pollution and lots of cars. It is <br />difficult for me to support you when my son can't feel safe enough to ride his bike to <br />school." <br />Daryl Mullins, 3428 Smoketree Commons, spoke in opposition to this project. He expressed <br />concern about business blight and was concerned about what would happen if this store did not <br />succeed. He noted that should business conditions change, the big box would remain. He did not <br />believe the Planning Commission was the proper forum for that consideration and noted that the <br />City Council maybe the proper forum. He noted that he had a Masters degree in Electrical <br />Engineering and an MBA and that he ran a business in Pleasanton. He had heazd no verification <br />from the traffic engineer that his ITE surveys and simulations had been verified by the rubber-hose <br />data taking. He expressed concern that the driveway widths; the Safeway driveway was 44 feet <br />wide, and the standazd home driveway was 21 feet wide. He noted that the applicant was depending <br />on the additional lane to have an entrance into the center at a certain speed. If the driveway is not <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2006 Page 12 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.