PC 112906 - Laserfiche WebLink

comments a speaker is making and that she would appreciate it if everyone in the audience would have respect for the speakers as they present their point of view. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Father Dan Danielson, Pastor, Catholic Community of Pleasanton, 3999 Bernal Avenue, described the Saint Augustine and Saint Elizabeth Seton Churches, history of this application and noted that the Church's facility at Saint Augustine had become cramped and overcrowded. The Diocese of Oakland had purchased additional property and began identifying needs for the community. He described the past plans for staff and other office space, a chapel for smaller services and daily mass, and the lazge church and pazking lot. The proposed development addressed the needs of the Church and its service to the community, including the community center. He noted that the Church at Saint Elizabeth Seton currently had youth groups and divorce and bereavement groups meeting in chapel space rather than in a sepazate meeting space. He noted that their Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) basketball program service children throughout the community from third to eighth grade and that through this project, the Church tried to fulfill its commitment to the youth. He indicated that the program has a small gym at Saint Augustine and rented gymnasium space in town. He indicated that high school youth are meeting where they can, and this facility would have a dedicated room for them to meet. He indicated that he would try to accommodate reasonable expectations and needs and concerns people have and indicated he was open to questions. In response to Acting Chairperson Fox's inquiry regazding why the Church decided to place the building next to Rheem Drive rather than at its original location on the 1998 Master Plan, Fr. Danielson noted that in the first plans in 1989, nothing was proposed for that space because the intent then was to sell that piece to help pay for the building of the Church. The revised 1998 Master Plan included a building on the site; however, the entire property was brought into the planning process, and based on the community's needs as they developed, the Church felt that the space would not be lazge enough for a school, given the needs of present elementazy schools. He added that should a school be built in the future, the eastern portion of the property that is approximately four acres between Nielsen Park and the Church would be sufficient for the necessary buildings as well as a play azea. Acting Chairperson Fox inquired whether, if a school and gym were both located in the eastern lot between Nielsen Pazk and the existing Church, it might make sense to build the gymnasium at the eastern portion next to the school to be built eventually, with both buildings in the same location, so that the children would not have to walk across the pazking lot to the gymnasium. Fr. Danielson replied that given what he has observed of today's schools, everything available is utilized no matter where in property they aze located, including across the property to get to the gym. He then introduced John Miller, project architect, who will also respond to all technical questions regarding the project. John Miller, project architect, 100 View Street in Mountain View, displayed the site plan and elevations and described the design, circulation, and pazking features of the proposed PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 29, 2006 Page 8 of 28