PC 112906 - Laserfiche WebLink

concentration of public and private schools along the surrounding two-block area. She commented that moving the future Saint Elizabeth Seton school eastward on the property would bring it much closer to the already existing Hacienda School. In a response to Acting Chairperson Fox's question regazding if the future school for Saint Elizabeth Seton were to be placed next to Nielsen Pazk, there would be less than a 1,500-foot sepazation between the proposed school and Hacienda School, Mr. Iserson indicated did not know the exact distance but that it sounded correct. Acting Chairperson Fox asked Mr. Iserson that from a planning perspective, given those approximate distances and the proximity of the Hacienda School and comparing a proposed gymnasium building closing at 10:00 p.m. or 11:00 p.m. versus a proposed school building closing at 6:00 p.m., where he would place each building on the site. Ms. Hazryman advised Mr. Iserson that before answering the question, the public hearing should be closed. Acting Chairperson Fox asked Ms. Harryman if it would be more appropriate to ask the question after the remaining speakers had addressed the Commission. Praveen Sharma, 4227 Diauila Avenue, agreed with the concerns of the previous speakers and was especially concerned that the notification did not show the new location of the building. He stated that some of his neighbors shared the same impression of the revised location. Mr. Shatma indicated that most of the surrounding neighbors were not even aware that the Church is moving the proposed building locations to the other side of the Church. He indicated that the notification does not show where the building is being built. Many people he has spoken to believe that the building is being built by Nielsen Pazk as was approved in the 1998 Master Plan. Commissioner Peazce asked to see a copy of the notice. In response to Acting Chairperson Fox's inquiry as to whether Mr. Sharma's interpretation of the notice is that it gives no information that the building is being moved from the pazcel adjacent to Nielsen Park as was approved in the 1998 Master Plan to the corner of Rheem Drive and Stoneridge Drive and that the neighborhood is unawaze of the revisions, Mr. Sharma indicated this was correct. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether the revised location of the building was clearly indicated at the last neighborhood meeting, Mr. Otto asked whether Commissioner Olson was referring to the notice for the neighborhood meeting or the actual neighbor meeting held on October 5~'. Mr. Otto confirmed that it was made clear at the meeting. In a response to an inquiry by Commissioner Peazce regazding whether the same people who received the neighborhood meeting notice received the Planning Commission notice, Mr. Otto indicated the group was the same. Commissioner O'Connor asked whether it was the same type of notice that may not have clearly shown the location of the building. Acting Chairperson Fox recalled it was the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 29, 2006 Page 15 of 28