Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Blank expressed concern that there may be noise that did not exceed the <br />noise ordinance but was bothersome to the neighbors. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regazding whether the existing <br />buildings would be accessed from the farm road, Ms. Decker confirmed that was her <br />understanding. She also indicated that the below-standazd number of parking spaces at <br />the Mitchell Katz Winery had not become a problem. <br />In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox regarding whether the site was <br />located within the Vineyazd Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, Ms. Decker believed it was <br />outside the plan area. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Mike Callahan, applicant, noted that he had worked with staff and wished to clarify the <br />operations and address the Commissioners' concerns. He noted that there were <br />132 pazking spaces shown where 156 was required; if the wine tasting room and the <br />event center were to be run at the same time, that would be the number of spaces needed. <br />He noted that the winery would run from Thursday through Sunday, from 12:00 noon to <br />5:00 p.m.; almost every event would start at 5:00 p.m. or later. He noted that the event <br />center would be able to use some of the winery's pazking. He advised that the latest <br />memo, dated October 25, 2006, contained a compilation of points after meeting with the <br />neighbors. Formerly the hours were 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. daily; the event would cease <br />at 11:00 p.m., the customers would leave, and the staff would clean up until midnight. <br />The neighbors had expressed concern about those hours during the week, and the hours <br />were changed to 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. from Monday through Thursday. The closing <br />hours would remain at 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday, as they have at the Mitchell <br />Katz Winery. On the eve of national holidays, the hours could remain at 11:00 p.m., <br />which was agreeable to the neighbors. <br />With respect to Acting Chairperson Fox's question about the zoning for this use, <br />Mr. Callahan noted that this was part of the origina147-acre Ruby Hill Winery. He noted <br />that there were three pazcels carved off from it and displayed the pazcels that he owned. <br />He added that the site was also part of the Tri-Valley Conservancy as well as the South <br />Livermore Valley Area Plan. He described the features and uses of the site as well as the <br />necessary renovations of the buildings. He noted that they needed the support of the <br />community for the facility to be economically viable; he realized that having the <br />neighbors unhappy with the facility from the outset would not be smart. They decided to <br />move the two potential noisemakers to the farthest point on the property, which he <br />displayed on the overhead screen. He noted that the architecture was flavored after a <br />Spanish hacienda and noted that the "Spanish Sand" color was identical to that used in <br />the Palm Event Center. He added that the stone on the tower element was the same as <br />that used on the bridge in Ruby Hill (Tahoe River Rock), which he believed would create <br />continuity going through Ruby Hill. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 25, 2006 Page 4 of 21 <br />