My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102506
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 102506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:27:20 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:06:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/25/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 102506
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank noted that it would be a positive mitigation if this house had <br />150 points versus 50 points. <br />Commissioner O'Connor supported the green building comments but did not believe that <br />necessarily took away from the visual impact. He did not object to the size of the home <br />as proposed and believed that a higher green building rating would be helpful. He did <br />have a problem with putting a home of this size on top of the hill. <br />Acting Chairperson Fox echoed Commissioner O'Connor's comments and noted that she <br />had an issue with the size of the home at the high elevation. She would prefer to see a <br />5,000-square-foot home at that elevation, or perhaps demolish the barn and the existing <br />home in order to go higher. She noted that while she liked the Reznick project, she voted <br />no on it because she believed the projects should be consistent with the Vineyard <br />Corridor Specific Plan. She indicated that she would rather see smaller-sized homes on <br />hillsides. <br />Mr. Pico understood the concerns about the size of the house and visual screening and <br />noted that they would address those concerns before coming back with a revised design. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Ms. Roberts noted that she wished this home design were smaller because it was one of <br />the largest homes she had seen this Commission address. She believed the site should be <br />open space and that she would like the road to go the other way; she also believed the <br />home should be resited. <br />Mr. Reznick believed the Specific Plan tried to keep homes out of the open space. <br />No action was taken. <br />d. PDR-561/PV-158 John Miller Archttectsi~a~nt r;nzaoetn Teton ~,nurcn <br />Applications for: (1) design review approval to modify the Saint Elizabeth Seton <br />Church Master Plan to construct an approximately 22,296-square-foot parish <br />center building with gymnasium and related site improvements on the existing <br />church site located at 4001 Stoneridge Drive; and (2) a vaziance from the <br />Municipal Code to allow the proposed parish center building with gymnasium to <br />be approximately 34 feet tall, where 30 feet is the maximum height limit. <br />This item was continued to the meeting of November 8, 2006. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Crown Pub on St. Marv's Street <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that there was a house on St. Mary's Street that had a sign <br />looking for journeyman carpenters, and there did not appear to be any work occurring. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 25, 2006 Page 19 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.