My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 101806
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 101806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:27:12 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/18/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 101806
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Regarding Physical Standazds (Section 17.04.040), Acting Chairperson Fox wanted to <br />ensure that of the 25-percent units, the affordable units were not clustered in one or two <br />units so that they would be identifiable as an affordable housing cluster. Mr. Bocian <br />noted that was set forth in the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. <br />With respect to Item 3 addressing CC&R's and maintenance, Acting Chairperson Fox <br />noted that she has seen many balconies being used as storage azeas. Mr. Bocian believed <br />that would be covered by the CC&R's. <br />Acting Chairperson Fox inquired about retroactively converting developments to the <br />Federal ADA requirements. Mr. Bocian noted that if the units were being retrofitted, <br />they must meet all of the zoning and building code requirements. <br />Page 4 <br />With respect to Item 3 (Parking), Acting Chairperson Fox would like to clazify that <br />parking shall be in accordance with the current pazking ordinance if the existing project <br />was initially approved as an apartment. Mr. Bocian advised that Item 3 required that it <br />conform to the condominium pazking requirements. <br />With respect to Noticing Requirements (Section 17.04.050), Acting Chairperson Fox <br />~ inquired whether the property owner, the developer, or the City would be responsible for <br />delivering the notice. Mr. Bocian replied that it would be the responsibility of the <br />property owner who submits the application for conversion. Acting Chairperson Fox <br />requested that that be clazified within the document. <br />With respect to Item D.1., Acting Chairperson Fox would like to see the extension of <br />time for low-income tenants to be increased from one to two yeazs. She would also like <br />to see some language stating that Section VIII voucher-holders may have similaz rights to <br />continue their residency for at least the amount of time allowed for low-income tenants. <br />Mr. Bocian noted that depending on the rent cycle, the low-income rents may equal or <br />exceed mazket rents. The thought was to give low-income households some extra time. <br />In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox regazding when the clock started <br />with respect to lease extensions, Mr. Bocian confirmed that it would start from the date of <br />the notice of the intent to convert. <br />P_ <br />With respect to Item E.2. (Price Reductions), Commissioner Pearce inquired whether the <br />"as-is" price reduction may be taken on top of the price reduction after 18 months of <br />tenancy. Mr. Bocian confirmed that was the case. <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that in the Mountain View instance she cited, there were <br />~"' multiple renters on the lease agreement. She inquired how the condominium conversion <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 18, 2006 Page 16 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.