My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 101806
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 101806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:27:12 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/18/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 101806
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br />~ ~. ~ <br />j'L£ ~~~4NTONo <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES <br />City Council Chambers <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />Wednesday, October 18, 2006 <br />CALL TO ORDER <br />APPROVED <br />The Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 2006 was called to order at 7:02 p.m. <br />by Acting Chairperson Fox. <br />1. ROLL CALL <br />Staff Members Present: Donna Decker, Principal Planner; Steven Bocian, Assistant <br />~" City Manager; Julie Hangman, Assistant City Attorney; <br />Wes Jost, Development Services Manager, and Cory <br />Emberson, Recording Secretazy. <br />Commissioners Present: Commissioners Phil Blank, Anne Fox, Greg O'Connor, <br />Arne Olson, and Jennifer Peazce. <br />Commissioners Absent: None. <br />2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />a. September 27, 2006 <br />Ms. Decker noted that because the meeting of October 11, 2006 was adjourned for lack <br />of a quorum, only the minutes of September 27, 2006, would be presented for approval. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that the second sentence of the third pazagraph on page 13 <br />should be modified to read as follows: "While he was sensitive to the privacy issue, he <br />did not believe it was watershed event that created an implied view easement." <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that the fourth sentence of the second pazagraph on <br />page 13 should be modified to read as follows: "She would support a project of about <br />2,700 squaze feet, which would be azound the squaze footage of a 40-percent FAR as well <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 18, 2006 Page 1 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.