PC 072606 - Laserfiche WebLink

Plan such that there is another set of criteria, for instance, for land designated as PUD-Open Space. Materials for the Augttst 23, 2006 Meetin Commissioner Olson inquired if it would be possible to have the materials for the August 23`d meeting delivered to the Commission when they become available rather than wait for the weekend before the meeting. He suggested that this could be done for some of the documents on the Oak Grove development. Ms. Decker replied that staff would be more than happy to provide whatever materials are available at an earlier date. Chairperson Arkin noted that the Commission had requested a list of materials and documents on the Oak Grove development such as the full-size visual simulations and site visits and inquired if this can be worked on between now and the next meeting. Ms. Decker replied that staff will work towazds providing the additional documentation requested by the Commission. She stated that because the project is currently in the public review and comment period, some of that documentation may not be done or as completely as some of the Commissioners may have had in mind. She explained that whatever comments the Commission would make regazding the Draft EIR, including any request for additional documentation, would be addressed in the Final EIR stage. DEIR Process for the Oak Grove Development Commissioner Olson questioned the process and inquired whether it was possible for the Commission to outline additional alternatives for the project. He noted that he had read the minutes of prior meetings and discussions on the project which contained other ideas and alternatives addressing that project which aze not included in the current package. At this point, Commissioner Blank recused himself and stepped down from the dais. Ms. Decker explained that what would be before the Commission at the August 23rd meeting would be the presentation of the remainder of the Draft EIR elements, after which the environmental consultant or staff would walk through the alternatives described in the Draft EIR. She reiterated that the Draft EIR stage is not a discussion of the actual project but aninformation-gathering stage during which the series of altematives will be considered, ending with the environmentally preferred Alternative 4. She reiterated that the Commission will have other opportunities beyond the public review comment period to talk about the project itself and that a workshop will be held to discuss the actual and the preferred alternatives. ~~-`~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 26, 2006 Page 21 of 24