My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071206
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 071206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:24:37 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/12/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 071206
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Fulton stated that the plan as presented to staff grossly misrepresents the visual impact of the <br />project by originally using only six locations, all of which were in Kottinger Ranch. He noted <br />that four other sites have been added in Grey Eagle Court, Red Feather Court, and a few others. <br />He stated that one of the reasons why the pictures aze problematic is because 28-millimeter <br />wide-angle lenses were used for all the pictures except that from Bernal Avenue, which utilized a <br />55-millimeter wide-angle lens. He stated that a 28-millimeter lens produce pictures that do not <br />truly represent what the eye actually sees and makes everything look much more insignificant. <br />Mr. Fulton stated putting the road on top of the ridge and then dropping the houses down on <br />either side would produce a visual impact of rooflines rather than a natural ridgeline. He noted <br />there were no views of the horizon of Matazo Court, Grey Eagle, Vintage Hills, Vintage Hills II, <br />the views from the Busch property, and that instead of seeing hillsides, one would be looking at <br />houses. He added that the developers claim that the reason for the ridgeline placement was for <br />environmental reasons, but he believed it was because it would be less expensive to do since not <br />as much dirt would have to be moved, and each lot could be sold for twice as much because of <br />the view from the house. However, from the rest of the town, the view of the ridgelines would <br />be replaced by looking up at the houses. He indicated that the citizens of Pleasanton fought long <br />and hazd to save the ridge and that caze should be taken with the only other ridgelines left in the <br />southeast hills. <br />Mr. Fulton stated that in the biological study, the azea just west of Court 1 and north of Hearst <br />Drive that were initially proposed for a pazk is daily haunted by hawk, kites, owls, vultures and <br />fox at night. He added that the same azea right below Court 1 has had several landslides over the <br />years and is so steep such that kids who used to go up there with their four-wheel drives needed <br />to be pulled out. <br />Mr. Fulton concluded that there is the oppomtnity now to determine whether the future horizons <br />will be ridgelines or rooflines and that he personally voted for ridgelines. <br />Russell Schmidt, 18 Grey Eagle Court, on the north boundary, two existing houses down from <br />the proposed exit to the EVA. He requested that noise during construction be addressed, <br />particulazly the backup beepers on heavy construction equipment, especially since the buildout <br />period is estimated to six to eight yeazs. He inquired if anything could be done to abate the <br />sound such as taming the volume down or changing its frequency. He also noted that <br />construction hours were proposed to be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. but does not specify if that <br />included weekends. He requested that if construction work is allowed on weekends, no backup <br />beepers be allowed on Saturday and Sunday. <br />Mr. Schmidt then addressed the issue of dust and wind. He stated that typically during the <br />summer, the area gets prevailing winds from south-southwest between 10 and 20 miles an hour, <br />which have blown away lawn equipment and umbrellas off their stands. He added that moving <br />700,000 cubic yazds of soil is going to result in a lot of dust in the air and requested that attention <br />be paid to that. He stated that there would also be an impact on nighttime views and glaze. <br />Mr. Schmidt continued that on page 74 of the Draft EIR, there are four bullet items on proposed <br />mandatory design guidelines in relation to directing lighting down onto the lot and not having <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.