Laserfiche WebLink
assurances that the azea would remain open space and that it was absurd that the <br />(~ neighbors needed to come and speak when prior approvals have already determined the <br />site to remain as open space. He expressed his resentment to staffl s representation of the <br />uses allowed by the Public & Institutional zoning, making it appeaz that the neighbors <br />should be pleased to have housing instead on the site. He indicated that the half-acre site <br />was designed as a setback mitigation for the approval of the convalescent care facility. <br />He stated that the proposed homes should not be allowed and requested the Commission <br />to deny the project. <br />Bonnie Kirchbaum, 303 Neal Street, indicated her opposition to the development of the <br />two vacant lots and would like them to remain as open space for the neighborhood. She <br />expressed her concern that the Planning Commission had not been provided the 1971 <br />approval documents she had on hand and felt that staff was trying to hold back the <br />documents from the decision makers. She added that in 1971, the Design Review Board <br />and the Planning Commission changed the zoning on the site and that Resolution <br />No. 1070, dated February 23, 1971, approved a 129-bed facility with the condition that <br />the parcel not be any smaller than 3.44 acres, which required the then developer to <br />purchase land to maintain the minimum site size for the project. She added that the <br />conditions dated December 14, 1971 required a front setback of 145 feet and a <br />landscaping plan. She stated that she was not in favor of having lazge homes on small <br />lots and preferred not to have the lot split. She stated that the City's promises to retain <br />this open space should be kept and noted that no changes should be allowed. <br />~-- Steve Samuelian, 300 Neal Street, owner and applicant, provided an overview of the <br />development and rehabilitation of the facility, indicating that a new roof had been <br />installed, a design review process undertaken for a porte cochere, and the patio and <br />outdoor areas were under rehabilitation. He described the liability issues the facility <br />faced with the neighborhood believing that the open space azea was considered to be a <br />"bona fide pazk" for its use and enjoyment. <br />Mr. Samuelian clarified that the proposed project was less than the 40-percent FAR <br />required. He emphasized that he was not an outside investor and wished to continue to <br />be a good neighbor. He noted that the house was a bonus for his facility manager's hazd <br />work and dedication to Generations Healthcare. He stated that they had worked hazd <br />with staff to bring a project forwazd that would fit in the neighborhood and added that <br />while he liked the wraparound porch and the high-pitched roof, he would be happy to <br />work with staff's preference. <br />Christine Bourg, 4512 Second Street, believed the open space should remain in perpetuity <br />and disagreed with the City's deference to developers. She expressed her resentment at <br />having the neighbors continue to come to meetings and noted that if staff did their job, <br />the project would not be supported and would never have been allowed to get this far. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />~-' <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 14, 2006 Page 15 of 18 <br />