My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042606
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 042606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:23:59 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:29:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/26/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 042606
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Roberts moved to find that the proposed PUD development plan <br />conforms to the Pleasanton General Plan, the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specifc <br />Plan, and the purposes of the PUD Ordinance; to make the PUD Development Plan <br />Findings as stated in the staff report, and to adopt a resolution recommending <br />approval of PUD-99-14 as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report and including the <br />changes proposed by staff. <br />Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Fox proposed an amendment to Condition No. 3.a., Permitted Uses, <br />to modify the definition of a small family day care as provided by State law. <br />Commissioners Roberts and Pearce accepted the proposed amendment. <br />Commissioner Fox wished to add a second amendment that there be a hazd-end date for <br />certain activities in the right-of--way, such as was done for the Valley Humane Society <br />application. <br />Ms. Decker suggested that providing a certain date for the use of the EVA, if forwazded <br />to the City Council, would be in conflict with the language of the Specific Plan as noted <br />above. <br />Commissioner Fox requested that staff look into traffic issues with respect to Montevino <br />Drive, speeds, and cut-through traffic. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that it was a very steep street, and braking was required all <br />the way down. <br />Ms. Decker noted that staff would include these concerns in the staff report, or in Matters <br />Initiated by Commission Members. She added that the design guidelines would return to <br />the Commission and acknowledged that the Commission was very concerned about them. <br />Commissioner Roberts suggested that a photo montage be created for Lot 13. <br />Commissioner Pearce liked this project, which was appropriate for the area, but was very <br />concerned about the traffic and the EVA. She would like to see Claza Lane developed as <br />soon as possible. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Maas, Pearce, and Roberts. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: Commissioner Arkin. <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Blank and Maas. <br />Resolution No. PC-2006-23 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 26, 2006 Page 16 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.