My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042606
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 042606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:23:59 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:29:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/26/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 042606
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioners Pearce and Roberts disclosed that they had also met with the applicant <br />before the first Planning Commission appeazance. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Mori Hatsushi, applicant, 80 S. Buchanan Circle, Pacheco, thanked the Commissioners <br />for their input and looked forward to fulfilling his father's dream. <br />Ralph Hughes, 4471 Stoneridge Drive, on behalf of the applicant, noted that he was <br />available to answer questions. Mr. Hughes requested the opportunity to respond to <br />comments at the end of the public testimony. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether the four houses <br />would be built simultaneously, Mr. Hughes replied that they would not. The houses <br />would be on custom lots, and most of the Phase I lots would go to family members, who <br />would build the homes as soon as possible. He noted that one or two may be sold <br />because a family member is attending medical school on the East Coast. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding cattle, Mr. Hughes <br />confirmed that Mr. Hatsushi intended to raise two or three head of cattle. <br />Ron Lloyd, 854 Montevino Drive, noted that he and the applicant were unable to come to <br />an agreement regarding the depth of the property and added that he did not support the <br />EVA. He and Mr. Hatsushi agreed in principle on the amount of space as being <br />1,500 squaze feet and did not believe that would affect the development of 80,000 square <br />feet of lots. He believed that staff s recommendation of this development would place a <br />home as high as 25 feet, 17 feet above his lot level, and within 50 feet of his home, <br />thereby obliterating the view from his house. He did not want an EVA with construction <br />on it adjacent to his home. If the EVA is to stay, he suggested limiting the height of the <br />home to eight feet above his home and dropping the grading on Lot 13 down to ten feet, <br />which Mr. Hatsushi had considered. He would like the home to be limited to <br />3,000 squaze feet and to be pushed as faz back south and east as possible on Lot 13 to <br />increase their privacy. He requested that the setback on the front of Lot 13 be pushed <br />farther forward to increase their privacy as well. He was also concerned about the speed <br />of traffic and construction noise. He did not know that Pazcel A would be made part of <br />the Hatsushi home and had made numerous offers to buy that pazcel from the City. He <br />would like that accommodation to offset the impact on their property and was concerned <br />about a negative impact on his property value. Mr. Lloyd also indicated that he had <br />unsuccessfully tried to negotiate the purchase of a portion of the Hatsushi property that <br />would provide an additional buffer. <br />Ira Madnick, 3095 Crestablanca Drive, believed the request that the roads not be built <br />first to be very unusual. He requested that the development roads be built before the <br />homes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Apri126, 2006 Page 13 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.