My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020806
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 020806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:23:26 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:13:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 020806
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Arkin suggested that Mr. Roush read the letter and provide comments. <br />Mr. Roush advised that he had not seen that particulaz from the Spotornos. He noted that <br />the Commission should be aware of certain issues and developments and that he would <br />discuss the matter with the City Manager. He was aware of some discussion about this <br />matter although he was not fully briefed. He indicated that he would provide the <br />Commission with a memo that would include additional information on the matter. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that she had missed the Hacienda Business Park joint meeting <br />that preceded this issue being raised. When it came up at the next meeting about Oak <br />Grove and the City's hiring of a mediator to work with the neighbors, she was surprised <br />but did not comment because it may have been covered at the meeting she missed. She <br />noted that a mediator had become involved in a project before it had gone through the <br />City process and believed it was very uncommon for that to occur before the City <br />process. She believed it was important that the City demonstrate the ideals in the <br />Community of Character mission statement and that these issue be discussed in the public <br />forum. She did not agree that the City should hire an outside mediator before the project <br />even came forward. <br />Chairperson Arkin suggested that there be an agenda item to discuss this item, and <br />matters relating to the South Pleasanton hills. <br />Mr. Roush stated that staff would provide some documentation to the Commission to <br />~ provide some framework for the issue and suggested that if after reading that <br />documentation, the Commission still wished to agendize it, that could occur. <br />Commissioner Fox would like to know whether the mediated discussions aze private or <br />open to the public. <br />Mr. Roush advised that those discussions were private by definition and were not noticed. <br />American Plannine Association Awazd <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the City of Livermore received an outstanding award <br />from the American Planning Association for implementation, innovation, and approach to <br />balance and preservation the vineyards for the South Livermore Valley Plan. She noted <br />part of that Plan also included all of Ruby Hills and part of the V ineyazd Corridor in <br />Pleasanton. She suggested that a letter of congratulations would be more appropriate to <br />come from the Planning Commission rather than the City, because it was a planning <br />association's award. <br />Planners Institute Conference <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the March 22, 2006 meeting fell on the first day of the <br />Planners Institute conference in Monterey. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 8, 2006 Page 15 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.