04/09/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

-~ PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Planning Co®iasion of the City of Pleasanton on the 9th day of April, 1969, by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioner Antonini Commissioner Arnold Commissioner Gibbs Vice Chairman Garrigan Noes: 6. PUBLIC HBABINGS - NEW BUSINESS Absent: Chairman Plato Attest: Secretary Castro a. P.U.D.-69-1. George Oskes Application for a P.U.D. for seven six-plex units located north of West Lea Positas Boulevard and west of Fairlanda Drive, fronting on Fairlands Drive, containing 2.1 acres. Vice Chairman Garrigan opened the Public Nearing. Planning Director Castro explained the staff report, stating that there are no further comments to be made by the Planning Department. Mr. Castro remarked that Lota 1, 2 and 3 are overbuilt and should be revised. Mr. George Oakes was present and first reiterated the history of this application. There was some discussion regarding the landscaping of these three lots, which was the main objection of the Planning staff. The landscaping will be provided under the final development plans. Mr. Bob Pearson, 3590 Churchill Court, raised objections, pointing out from Zoning Ordinance No. 520, " ..a PUD may propose a reduction in minimum site area per dwelling unit not exceeding 50 per cent of the off-site area required in the proposed final soning district, provided that co®on open space in addition to usable open space required by Sec. 2.110, (Usable Open Space), and public park land provided in accordance with Ordinance 439 shall be designated, developed and maintained in an amount equal to the permitted reduction in dwelling unit site area." According to Mr. Pearaon's calculations, the City is now owed approximately 2,000 sq.ft. in park dedication land. Mr. Oakes disagreed with this remark and Mr. Jack Boatedt of MacKay @ Sompa, engineers for Pleasanton Meadows, spoke against this, stating that Mr. Oakes had contributed 1.5 scree more than was necessary under the park dedication obligation. Upon motion of Vice Chairman Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, the Public Hearing was closed. There was a certain amount of discussion about amending a P.U.D. within a P.U.D. Mr. Castro stated that it was proper to modify a P.U.D. through a P.U.D. procedure. In addition, he does not feel the proposal is too far of a deviation from a standard application. Lots 1, 2 and 3 are roughly 660 ft. below the minimum, Lot 4 is 300 ft. below minimum and Lots 5, 6 and 7 comply with the District. Mr. Castro stressed to the Co~iasioners that this is just the concept being applied for, which after approval, will go before City Council, after which Mr. Oaken could submit his final design plane. Upon motion of Commissioner Gibbs, seconded by Commissioner Arnold, and carried, the following resolution was offered: - 4 -