Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />,~ <br />IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />M I IQ U T E S: <br />p regular adjourned meeting of the Planning Comrission <br />of the City of Pleasanton was held at 8:00 P, M, Wednesday, <br />August 3. 1955• Absent, Commissioner Nevis, <br />present, <br />Minutes of the last meeting were approved. <br />Councilmen Trimingham, Abrott, Cairo and Rector were <br />Copy of a letter from the Dlstrict Attorneys Office <br />to the Alarieda County Planning Commission, dated August 2, 1955. <br />concerning Section 35009 of the Government Code and annexations <br />of agricultural zoned lands, was read. Discussion 'followed, in <br />which the view of the City Council and the view of the Planning <br />Coaunission was expressed by its respective members. No further <br />action was taken towards a recommendation for a zoning plan of <br />the 96th unit of Alameda County by the City Planning Commission, <br />The following correspondence was read and actions tak®n: <br />County Planning Commission re Tract 1672 (P ark view); <br />DSap studied and filed. <br />City of Pleasanton re Policy -- Instructions of the <br />City Council concerning recommendations to outside governmental <br />a„encies, concerning policy, were discussed and explained by <br />Council members, Filed. <br />Anthony Rose re Variance -- Posting ordered and <br />hearing set for August 18, 1955• <br />hlr. R. J. Deetz stated his problem at St, John and <br />Pleasanton Avenue. F.eferred to Building Inspector and City <br />Attorney, <br />D}r, George Andrews stated !,is problem near the water <br />-1- <br />