Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING CO?AQSSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASA.NTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />MINUTES <br />The meeting of the City Planning Commission was called to order at the City Hall <br />on June 20, 1957, at 8:20 P.M., Vice-Chairman Abrott presiding. <br />Roll Call; Present: - Commissioners Abrott, Hanifen, Hartle and tiJharton <br />Absent: - Commissioners Hewitson, Trowbridge and ~aetherby <br />The minutes of May 16, 195? were approved as read on motion of Commissioner Hani- <br />fen, seconded by Commissioner Wharton. <br />Correspondence: A letter from Pleasanton Construction Co. requesting a variance <br />to allow a 15 foot setback on Lot No. 1, Block 7 of Tract 1752 rather than the <br />required 20~ was read and discussed. On motion of Commissioner Hanifen, seconded <br />by Commissioner [+htarton a resolution recommending approval of the request will be <br />forwarded to the Council for their action. <br />A work session will be held on Monday, July 1st, to discuss the city fire zones <br />and their adequacy for present and future needs. <br />The City Administrator reported on the June 19th meeting of the Alameda County <br />Planning Commission relative to the County Tentative Master Plan. A request will <br />be forwarded to the City Council suggesting a joint meeting with the Planning Com- <br />mission to discuss the City~s recommendations on this plate. <br />Mr. Leslie Robertson was present for the continuance of the proposed Trailer Court <br />hearing. Chairman Abrott asked if any plans for requesting annexation of the land <br />had been made. Mr. Robertson stated that they would prefer to utilize the initial <br />five acres within the city limits first and after determining the success of the <br />project than request annexation of the balance of the 10 acres. As the proposed <br />rezoning of this land would make it available far commercial use the City Adminis- <br />trator pointed out the nusierous functions the land could be utilized for. Under <br />the present zoning ordinance the Planning Commission could not restrict the use of <br />commercial property to a Trailer Court. After further discussion Mr. Robertson re- <br />quested that his petition be withdrawn, to be resubmitted to the Commission after <br />the passage of the Interim Zoning Ordinance by the City Council. At that time it <br />would be possible far the Planning Commission to grant a conditional zoning permit. <br />Mr. Robertson will confirm his request for withdrawal of the petition by letter. <br />The discussion of the proposed subdivision ordinance was postponed until the City <br />Administrator had had an opportunity to review it. <br />Mr. Masonheimer than reported to the Commission the changes that the Council had <br />made in the Interim Zoning Ordinance, namely that Section 2.13 of Article 2 would <br />require a 510.00 fee only rather than the original 555.00; that section 1.041 of <br />Article 1 be changed to read "......family house to be built on lot of record is <br />Residential District."; section 2.17 of Article 2 rill nox read ".The Commission <br />shall issue a Conditional Zoning Permit therefore upon expiration of the appeal per- <br />iod provided for by the ordinance.."; and section 3.13 of Article 3 shall read "A <br />public hearing shall be held by the City Council within thirty days of filing of <br />notice of appeal." <br />There being no further business to come before the Commission the meeting was ad- <br />journed at 9:40 P.M. to meet again on Julp 18, 1957, at 8:00 P.M. at the City Hall. <br />Secretary <br />