02/05/59 - Laserfiche WebLink

ZN THE PLANNIN3 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PIEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1959 The meeting of the Pleasanton Planning Commission was called to order at City Hall on February 5, 1959, at 8:00 otclock, Vice Chairman Hanifen presiding. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Allison, l+h:arton, Lozano and Hanifen Absent: Commissioners DeVor, Mitchell and Wetherby On motion of Commissioner Allison, seconded by Commissioner Lozano and approved by all Commissioners present, the minutes of the meeting of January 8, 1959 were approved as submitted. Representatives of Nuclear Engineering, Inc. were present to request an amendment to Resolution P1o. 51, which granted them a Conditional Zoning Permit. The proposed agreement which vrould become terms of the amended Permit, upon approval of the City Planning Commission, was presented by the City Administrator. Discussion followed relative to the proposed sewer easement and future extension of the present se-vrer line. Upon motion of Commissioner Wharton, seconded by Commissioner Lozano the following amendments to Resolution No. 51 were approved by all Commissioners present: 1) Applicant would relocate the proposed building so that it is not over the exist- ing sewer line; 2) Applicant or owner would grant the City an easement of record for the existing sewer line; 3) Said easement will provide that City would relinquish and grant title for the owner upon relocation or abandonment of existing sewer line; 4) The City would permit applicant to use the existing sewer line, not to exceed one- half of the capacity of said 6" line; 5) Owner will grant the City a 10~ sewer ease- ment along the easterly boundary from Ray Street to Arroyo del Valle; b) Upon further expansion by applicant requiring relocation of existing line, applicant will grant the City a new easement to hold the existing sewer, runnir;g at right angles to the proper- ty line at a location to be agreed upon by applicant and the City. Inasmuch as neither Mr. Roy Jensen, or any representative, was present his applicat- ion for a Conditional Zoning Permit for Professional Tract will be held over until the next meeting. A letter from the County Planning Commission referring the request of Hedwig Gruening for a use permit to establish a rest home for six persons at Rt. 1 Box 33, Sycamore Road was read. Mrs. Gruening stated that there were no objections from the surround- ing neighbors, that a rest home had been in operation at that site for the past three years and that they were now seeking to obtain a permit to care for aged persons. Commissioner Wharton made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Allison and approved by all Commissioners present that a letter be directed to the County Planning Commission stating that the Pleasanton Commission had no objections to the granting of the permit. Mr. Raymond Souza and Mr. Charles Palmer Presented their request for a Conditional Zoning Permit to establish the Valley Office Equipment Co. at 416 N.ain Street, Pleasan- ton. On motion of Commissioner Wharton, seconded by Commissioner Lozano and approved by all Commissioners present, RESOLUTION N0. 52 was adopted, stating that no public hearing is deemed necessary in the public interest on this matter; that the condit- ions of the applicable sections of Ordinance No. 276 are met, and that the Conditional Zoning Permit is hereby granted. Mr. Ray Haskell, Superintendant of Schools was present to discuss the coming bond election, calling for $350,000 bond issue, on the total Elementary School District. He enumerated the future needs of the school district, the proposed use of the money received, the State Aide program, tax rates, etc. He stated that the new funds would be used for the establishment of a new school, possibly located on the Muaso property on Vineyard Avenue and providing for the immediate erection of a 12,000 sq. ft. building. Further discussion relative to the proposed improvementof Vineyard Ave. and the adjacent sewer line by the City and the resultant benefit to the school followed. A letter from the County Planning Commission, ecnlosing a Summary on Conference on