|
MINUTE S
<br />of
<br />THE MEETING
<br />of
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION
<br />Pleasanton, California
<br />Julq 5, 1962
<br />The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at
<br />8:05 Y.M. on Thursday, July 5, 1462, by Chairman Pro Tempura Frank Lozano.
<br />ROLL CALL showed the following:
<br />PRESENT: Chairman Lozano
<br />Commiesionara Antonini
<br />Wipfli
<br />Secretary Falea
<br />ABSENT: Commissioners Landon
<br />Rego
<br />Ex Officio Dana
<br />Huhn
<br />Kamp
<br />On motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Wipfli, the minutes
<br />of the meeting of June 21 were approved as presented and unanimously adopted by
<br />the Commissioners present.
<br />Chairman Lozano reopened the public hearing on the request of Mre. Anna H. Brown,
<br />581 Mitchell Ava., San Leandro, for an amendment to Ord. No. 309, redesignating
<br />the property located at 484A and 484E Division Street from an R-1 (single-family'
<br />residential) District to an RG-15 (residential garden apartment) District. (Con-
<br />tinued from June 21, 1962.) Secretary Fales stated the staff was of the opinion
<br />that the area west of Main St, bounded by Pleasanton Avenue, Bernal Avenue and St.
<br />John Street should be rezoned to higher density, multiple residential usage, This
<br />particular request of Mrs. Brown for rezoning lies within that area. Mr. Fales
<br />recommended that at the aext meeting the Planning Commission consider rezoning s
<br />larger area rather than spot zoning of this particular property. Attorney Struthers,
<br />upon being asked if Mra. Brown is entitled to a decision on her property at this
<br />time, stated that spot zoning is neither unlawful nor illegal, but Mra. Brown mat
<br />make a decision whether or not she consents to a continuance of her application to
<br />come before the Commission at the meeting of July 19. Mr. Vick Stuchlik, represent-
<br />ing Mrs. Bruton, who was also in the audience, said she would agree to a continuance
<br />and wait for a decision on a larger area surrounding her property. It was moved
<br />by Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Coandsaioner Wipfli, and carried, that the
<br />staff be instructed to take the necessary measures for the Commission to hold a
<br />public hearing at the meeting of July 19 on rezoning a larger area from R-1 to R-15.
<br />Chairman Lozano then reopened the public hearing on the request of Mr, Robert
<br />Demeyer, 4421 Pleasanton Ave., for a variance from Section 6.5, Ord. No. 309, in
<br />order to construct a carport in an R-1 (single-faffily residential) District. (Con-
<br />ti:rued from June 21, 1962.) Mr. Demegar was preasat in the audience and subffitted
<br />a revised drawing for Comffisaion consideration, Mr. Fales pointed out that accord-
<br />ing to the revised drawing, Mr. Demeyer now requests a 5 ft. variance rather than
<br />the original 10 ft, variance. On motion of Comsieaioner Wipfli, seconded bq Com-
<br />ffiasioner Antonini, the following resolution was unanimously adopted:
<br />RSSOLUZ~ON N0,-,,-,_176
<br />WHEREAS, the application of Mr. Robert Demeyer, 4421 Pleasanton Avenue,
<br />for a variance of five feet from the front yard setback raquisa-
<br />ments of Section 6.5, Ord, No. 309, to allow construction of a
<br />carport. at 4421 Pleasanton Avenue, in an R-1 (single-family resi-
<br />dential) District, having coma before this Comffiealoa on July 5,
<br />1962, under Ord. No. 309, as amended, the Planning Commission
<br />does hereby resolve as follows:
<br />
|