|
M I N U T E S
<br />of
<br />THB MBETING
<br />of
<br />THS PLANNING COMi~SSION
<br />Pleasanton, California
<br />June 26, 1963
<br />Due to the lack of a quorum oa the above data, the meeting of the Planning Co®ie-
<br />eion was not held,
<br />July 10, 1963
<br />The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at
<br />8:00 P,M., on Wednesday, July 10, 1963, by Chairman Philip Landon.
<br />ROLL CALL showed the following:
<br />Present: ComQd.eaioners Antonini
<br />Rega
<br />Wipfli
<br />Chairman Landon
<br />Secretary Falea
<br />Absent: Commd.aeioaer Lozano
<br />On motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Wipfli, the minutes of
<br />the meeting of June 12 were unanimously approved as presented by those Comaiaaionere
<br />present.
<br />Secretary Fales referred to the meeting of May 16, 1963, and stated that the City
<br />Attorney recommends that the change of meeting night for the Commission, which was
<br />done by motion on that date, be done by resolution, and that Resolution No, 220 has
<br />been reserved for this purpose. Upon motion of Commissioner Rega, seconded by Cam-
<br />misafoner Wipfli, the following resolution was unanimously adopted by those Commie-
<br />aionera present:
<br />RESCQ.UTION NO. 220
<br />RESOLVED, that the Pleasanton Planning Commission shall change their
<br />regular meetings to the second and fourth Wednesdays o£ each
<br />month, at 8:00 P.M., commencing June 12, 1963.
<br />Chairman Landon opened the public hearing on the application of Mra. Caroline
<br />Henningeen, 1056 Division Street, for a Variance from Section 6.5 and Section
<br />16.602, Ord. No. 309, in order to create a lot with a reduced area sad rearyard
<br />setback, and a reduced sideyaxd for an accessory building at the above location, in
<br />an R-1 District. Mra, Henningsen was present in the audience and further clarified
<br />her request. There being no other comments from the audience, Chairman Landon de-
<br />clared the public hearing closed. Mr. False gave the staff report and explained
<br />that the lot in question is located at the south corner of Fair and Division
<br />Streets. The proposal is to divide the lot into two portions, each one including
<br />an existing dwelling unit. The applicant ie requesting a Variance from Section 6.5
<br />and Section 16.602, Ord. No. 309, in order to subdivide the one lot into two lots.
<br />Oae lot would have an area of 5,734 eq.ft., whereas the minimum lot area in an R-1
<br />liatrict is 6,500 eq.ft., necessitating a Variance of 766 eq,ft. Also a Variance
<br />fpm Section 16.602 is required to allow an accessory building with a sideyaxd set-
<br />back of 1.26 ft. from a required sideyaxd of 5 ft., or a Variance of 3.74 ft. A
<br />15~ft, rear yard Variance 19 also requested (from the required 20 ft. to 5 ft.) Mr.
<br />Falta stated also that Mra. Henningaea has made application, under Ord. No. 358,
<br />fora minor subdivision. Mxe. Henningsen was advised to apply for Variances prior
<br />to C.1e calling of a meeting of the Subdivision Cpmmittee to consider the minor aub-
<br />divieion, Sidewalk, curb and gutter should be reviewed by the Subdivision CommitteE
<br />Mr, F;les added, The staff recommended the Variances be granted, and all remaining
<br />pertinent physical factors of the property be taken care of by the Subdivision Com-
<br />mittee. After considerable discussion by the Commission, City Attorney Struthers
<br />was asked for his comments, and he stated the City helped to create this situation
<br />when Fair Street was constructed by the County. This matter ie now subject to the
<br />discretion of the Commission. The City deeded the frontage to Mrs. Henningsen at
<br />the time Fair Street was cut through, Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, aecond-
<br />
|