03/11/64 - Laserfiche WebLink

E~ixaxT ^A^ March 11, 1964 CONDITIONS OF APPFOVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP TRACT 2595 1. Street Classification - The classification as indicated by street width on Exhibit "A" is recommended without change. 2. Street Names - To avoid conflicts in the Pleasanton area, it is recommended that the following street names not be used in this tract: Balboa Way, Carlos Court, Rivera Court. it is further recommended that substitutes for the above street names be chosen from the following abridged list submitted by the developer's engineer: Bivar, Alfonso, Mendoza and Cristobal, or from other names that the developer may submit for approval. Also Kolln should be used where Jensen is shown on the tentative. 3. Streets General - The following requirements shall be made pertaining to the streets. a. The pavement sections shall be in accordance with the Pavement Design as provided by the developer's Soil Engineer. 4. Specifications and Standard Details - In accordance with Section 8.01 of Ord. No. 358, it ie requested that the City Engineer be authorized to modify the City's existing Standard Specifications and Details in applying them to this subdivision in order to allow for modern materials, methods and design criteria ea may be required. Some specific recommend- ations for such modifications are ae follows: a. Specifications for sewer and water pipe should be modified to allow newer type joists. b. Specifications for street name signs should be modified to require white reflectorized letters, block numbers and arrows on green coated aluminum sheeting as previously approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. c. Reference should be made to the 1960 Standard Specifications of the State Division of Highways, rather than the 1954 edition, particularly with reference to roadway materials. 5. Storm Drainage Svetem - The following reco®endationa are made pertaining to the storm drainage system: a. That a field inlet be constructed to collect the runoff from the school property. b. That the developer's engineer determine and demonstrate that the area east of the tract does not contribute to the runoff of the tract. c. That the off-site drainage channel be designed with sufficient capacity to carry the tract drainage and all other drainage that would normally follow the proposed alignment.