|
MINUTES
<br />of
<br />THE DIEETING
<br />of
<br />THE PLA27~TING CO.AfISSION
<br />Pleasanton, California
<br />ids rch 11, 1964
<br />The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at
<br />8:00 P.M. on Wednesday, March 11, 1964, by Chairmen Philip Landon.
<br />ROLL CALL showed the following:
<br />Present: Commissioners Antonini
<br />Lozano
<br />Rega
<br />Chairman Landon
<br />Secretary Falea
<br />Absent: Commissioner Wipfli
<br />On motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the minutes of
<br />the meeting of February 26, 1964, were approved ae presented by unanimous vote of
<br />those Cormniesioners present.
<br />Chairman Landon opened the public hearing on the amended application of the Commun-
<br />ity Presbyterian Church of Pleasanton, 100 Neal Street, for an amendment to Ord.
<br />No. 309 rezoning Lots 4 and 5, Tract No. 2603, from R-1 to RG-15, and Lot 6, Tract
<br />No. 2603, from R-1 to R-2. Rev. Vogt was present in the audience. There being no
<br />comment from the audience, it was moved by Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Com-
<br />miaeioner Rega, and carried, that the public hearing be cloned. Mr. Falea read a
<br />letter from Mr. Bernard T. Gorton, dated February 20, 1964, amending Application
<br />for Rezoning No. RZ-64-1, dated January 9, 1964. Mr. Fates stated the application
<br />had been referred to the City's Planning Consultants for report and recommendation.
<br />The recommendation, contained in a report from Livingston and Blayney, dated March 4
<br />1964, states that it is recommended that the rezoning of Lota 4 and 5 to the RG-15
<br />District be denied because the resulting density would be too high for this Loca-
<br />tion and would be inconsistent with the character and present pattern of develop-
<br />ment in the area. However, should the applicant be interested in having all three
<br />lots rezoned to the R-2 District, the Planning Consultants would so recommend.
<br />Livingston and Blayney further recommended that when the tentative map for Tract No.
<br />2603 is submitted for approval, it allow for the eventual extension of the cut de
<br />sac to the east and provide access to the adjoining property when it ie developed.
<br />Mr. Heitman was present in the audience, representing the Community Presbyterian
<br />Church, and said they would prefer some zoning between R-2 and RG-15. However, Mr.
<br />False said in lieu of another zoning district, the City ie at a lose to make a
<br />suggestion. Chairman Landon suggested a variable zone. Mr. Falea stated the Plan-
<br />ning Conaultante might be requested to prepare an ordinance amendment creating a
<br />variable zone, but the General Plan preparation has not proceeded far enough so
<br />that the Conaultante might create one. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini,
<br />seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous
<br />vote of those Commissioners present:
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 278
<br />WHEREAS, the application of the Community Presbyterian Church of
<br />Pleasanton, 100 Neal Street, for an amendment to Ord. No.
<br />309 rezoning Lote 4 and 5, Tract No. 2603, from R-1 to RG-15, and
<br />Lot 6, Tract No. 2603, from R-1 to R-2 has come before this Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BR IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the City Planning Comml.saion hereby denies the above-
<br />named application for xezening, without prejudice, for the
<br />reason that the resulting density would be too high for this location
<br />and would be inconsistent with the character and present pattern of
<br />development in the area.
<br />
|