My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 89527
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
RES 89527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2012 4:11:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/1999 11:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Which sites have priority for receiving public art? <br /> <br /> The PCAC has identified the following priorities: <br /> (1) entrances to the City within right-of-way; (2) public <br /> parks; and (3) the Civic Center and other City <br /> buildings/parks in downtown. <br /> <br /> [Priorities are important for commissions/contests and for <br /> seeking out art for a particular place. Donations and <br /> acquisitions of artwork are likely to have to "find an <br /> appropriate site" rather than vice versa.] <br /> <br /> 8. Which artists are eligible for selection? <br /> <br /> The PCAC has favored "professional" artists, with a strong <br /> preference toward local (Pleasanton, Livermore, Dublin, and <br /> Sunol) artists, as those eligible to have artwork selected. <br /> <br /> [The breadth of eligible locations can affect whether <br /> "professional" or highly talented amateur pieces are <br /> acceptable. Outdoor art is not generally practiced by <br /> hobbyists, whereas many indoor art types (painting, weaving, <br /> quilting, stained-glass, etc.) have impressive local <br /> "amateur" practitioners.] <br /> <br /> 9. Who should select artwork? <br /> <br /> The PCAC proposes an ad hoc committee appointed by Council, <br /> including PCAC and staff members and at least two qualified <br /> art advisors (teachers, collectors, artists) knowledgeable <br /> in the procurement and valuation of art for each art <br /> selection. <br /> <br /> [Art is frequently controversial, generating strong <br /> opinions. In creating a vehicle for public art, any program <br /> risks art which may not reflect community values as seen <br /> from the present. Artwork selected by artists risks art <br /> outside community names, but it probably enhances selection <br /> of significant pieces. The proposed program attempts to <br /> balance these possibly competing forces by entrusting <br /> initial selection to an art-dominated group (but including <br /> lay persons), thereby ensuring value and substance, but by <br /> granting final approval to a lay body (Council or Design <br /> Review Board), thereby ensuring community acceptance. <br /> Alternatives to an ad hoc committee are a designated <br /> committee with fixed terms or a fully-fledged commission <br /> with authority over a broad spectrum of cultural activities, <br /> including the Art in Public Places program.] <br /> <br />IR:89:87 -4- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.