|
M I N U T E S
<br />of
<br />THE MEETING
<br />of
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION
<br />Pleasanton, California
<br />September 23, 1964
<br />The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planing Commission was called to order at
<br />8:00 P.M, on Wednesday, September 23, 1964, by Chairman Landon.
<br />ROLL CALL showed the following:
<br />Present: Commissioners Johnston
<br />Lozano
<br />Raga
<br />Chairmen Landon
<br />Secretary Fales
<br />Absent: Commissioner Antonini
<br />Upon ration of Commissioner Lozam, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, the minutes
<br />of the meeting of September 9, 1964, were approved ae presented by unanimous vote
<br />of those Commissioners present.
<br />Chairman Landon opened the public hearing on the application of Duke T. Bonds, Sr.,
<br />524 Neal St., fora Variance from Section 8.500, Ord. No. 309, in order to construct
<br />a carport within the required rear-yard setback, in connection with an existing
<br />duplex at 4420 Pleasanton Avenue, in an RG-15 District. Mr. False, in giving the
<br />staff report, quoted from Sections 16.602 and 18.102 of Ord.No. 309. The require-
<br />ment for this existing lot of record is for a 10-foot minimum rear yard, whereas
<br />the applicant wlehea Chie reduced to 8 feet to allow a 12-foot attached carport.
<br />The staff recommends that the Variance be granted, subject to the requirements of
<br />all other City ordinances. There being no comments from the audience, it was moved
<br />by Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, and carried, that the
<br />public hearing be closed, After diacuaelon by the Commission, upon motion of Com-
<br />missioner Rega, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was
<br />adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present:
<br />RESOLUTION N0, 344
<br />WHEREAS, the application of Duke T. Bonds, Sr., 524 Neal St., for a
<br />Variance from Section 8.500, Ord. No. 309, in order to con-
<br />struct a carport within the required rear-yard setback, in connection
<br />with an existing duplex at 4420 Pleasanton Aveme, in an RG-15 District,
<br />has came before Chia Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
<br />RESOLVED, that the above-named Variance ie hereby granted subject to the
<br />following conditions:
<br />1. The architecture of said carport moat substantially
<br />conform to the architecture of the exiating duplex.
<br />2. Said carport moat met ell other applicable City
<br />ordinances and regulations.
<br />Chairmen Landon then opened the public hearing on the application of Reno Cairo,
<br />4355 Second Street, for a Variance from Section 7.500, Ord. No. 309, in order to
<br />allow construction of a covered patio within the rear and aide-yard setbacks at
<br />the above address in an R-2 District. Mr. Falea, in giving the staff report,
<br />quoted from Section 16.602, Ord, No. 309, and stated that the applicant wishes to
<br />reduce the 5-ft. minimum aide-yard requirement to one foot. The existing house
<br />hoe a 7-ft.aideynrd and the existing guest house has a 5-ft. aide yard. Although
<br />a Variance may be granted to allow construction up to the property line, the Build-
<br />ing Code prohibits construction within 3 ft. unless a solid wall is constructs d
<br />having a one-hour fire resistive rating. Also, two additional Variances would be
<br />required from Section 16.604 of Ord. No. 309, one being the reduction of distance
<br />from the min building to the proposed patio from 14 ft, to 6 ft., and the other
<br />
|