10/14/64 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Fairfield added there would be a transition from large to smaller to large lots in the tract. Mr. Fales inquired ae to the amount of open space is the combined park and greenway areas that is actually gable. Mr. Fairfield proceeded to point out these areas on the map. Mr. Fales stated that he was concerned about the traffic carrying capacity of the direct frontage of Pine Avenue which is proposed to continue from Livermore to Highway 680. Mr, Fairfield said he understood it would not take the place of the freeway and would be for local traffic only. Mz. Falea said that it was hie undes- etanding that Livingston and Blayney are proposing changes in the traffic pattern. Considerable discussion ensued between Mr. Oakes and Mr. Fa lea with regard to traffic pattern. Mr. Fairfield then described the proposed location of schools. Mr. Falea and Mr. Fairfield discussed the possibility of zoning the areas of multi- ple dwelling unite as RG without specifically designating density, or zoning them RG-25 and later the developer could apply fora Planned Unit Development. Mr. Struthers recommended this be done by amendment. After further discussion by the Commission, upon motion of Commissioner Johnston, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: RESOLUTION N0. 353 RESOLVED: The City of Pleasanton Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council amendment of Ordinance No. 309 in order to provide zoning districts to the area included in Annexation No. 32, Roee Annex, ae follows: 1. For the area of Tract No. 2639: From the A (Agriculture) District to the R-1, C-N, C-T and RG-25 Districts, as indicated on the re- vised Preliminary Subdivision Map. There being no further buaineea to come before the Commission, upon motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 P.M., to meet again on Wednesday, October 28, 1964, at 8 P.M.