PC 01/06/65 - Laserfiche WebLink

Institutions. No comments. A¢riculture. No comments. Circulation. Mr. George Jacobson, 4100 Graham St., asked if provision had been made for eccentric widening at intersections. Mr. Blayney said this may well be, but the General Plan hasn't gone into detail. Mr. Fales said it has been decided in some instances, in order to save trees, that concentric widening is feasible, but this is not shown on the General Plan; however, both eccentric and concentric widenings are being considered. Mr. Rollin Cunningham inquired regarding mention of a portion of roads being paid for by the developer, but no mention is made how this is done. Chairmen Landon stated that in the Subdivision Ordinance provision is made that the cost of 20 ft. is borne by the subdivider. Mr. Cunningham inquired about the situation in unequal widening. Chairman Landon explained that the economics of the situation were not under consideration at this time. Mr. Blayney stated that Capital Improvement Programs are not planned to 1990, as this is not feasible. As the City has an obligation, 1t must find a way to get the funds, i.e., gas tax. Mr. Fa lea explained that the City has a continuing five-year Capital Improvement Program which is up- dated by the City Council every year. This is a continuing responsibility of the City. In this regard, Collier-Unruh funds is becoming available to the City in increasing amounts. Mr. Norman Warnaw inquired about a traffic signal at First and Ray Streets. Mr. Fales explained that a four-way traffic signal ie in this year's budget for the City of Pleasanton. Mr. Ken Volk inquired about adoption of the Pine Avenue interchange by the County. Mr. Blayney said the City will probably request the County to amend the General Plan if it is agreed upon at the proposed location. The interchange is not included in the freeway contract. Mr. George Musso, Director of Planning, City of Livermore, stated that the City of Livermore defines as its Planning Area the Livermore Area Recreation District, the High School and Elementary School Districts. There is an overlapping, therefore, of planning areas. There is some discrepancy in the airport approach zone. Also, the Livermore City Council does not wish to concede the east end of quarry opera- tions north of Stanley Boulevard. They wish to limit quarrying to existing permits. Chairman Landon asked Mr. Musso to present within the next few weeks a detailed report of the City of Livermore's recommendations of land uses in the overlapping areas. Mr. H.W. Kolb, representing the Committee for Incorporation of the City of Dublin, stated that the subject General Plan is in conflict with the Plan of the City of Dublin. He asked that none of the Murray School District be included within the Pleasanton Planning Area. It was moved by Commissioner Rega, eeconded by Commissioner Lozano, and carried, that the public hearing be closed. It was moved by Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Rega, and carried, that the next public hearing by the City of Pleasanton Planning Commission on the New Pleasanton Area General Plan be scheduled for Wednesday, January 27, 1965, at 5:00 P.M. There being nc further business to come before the Commission, upon motion of Com- missions: Antonini., seconded by Commissioner Johnston, and carried, the meeting was ax3journed at 10;45 P.I4., to meet again on Wednesday, January 13, 1965, at 5 P.M.