PC 02/10/65 - Laserfiche WebLink

After further diz~cus»ion b^ ~:he ~ommi=;>iu :, it ??ark •inoved by Chairman Landon, seconded by Coameissior..er. Lozano; and carried, that the Pine Avenue freeway inter- change and Pine dvenue as shown. on the General Plan be retained. :l letter: from Alan F. Grant,.9lameda County Planning Commission, dated February 8, 1965, proposed a cemetery on Vallecii:os Road for the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland. Mr. Blayny sca(:ac' c:ia~ a cemetery s::ould be in a valley or wide canyon aa3 isola%ed. t vas determi:,ed. tc dafyr_ this matter to the muting of i7ebruary 24. After further discussion by the Commission, it was moved by Chairman Landon, second- ed by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, that the following information is to be firanamitted to the City Coun:.il without zecommendation: 1. Residential Areas ao additional information submitted. 2. Commercial Areas a. Livingston acid Blayney indicated a proposed change in the General Plan text relating to neighborhood shopping centers, suggesting that reference to such centers being "4 to 6 acres" in size be amended to read "5 to 8 acres". Mr. Blayney explained that such a change would not affect the basic structure or role of the neighborhood center, but would only recog- nize increased off-street parking and landscaping requirements, in addition to the larger-sized main elements in such centers; the example provided being the increased sire of "super-markets". 3. Industrial Areafi A letter from the General Electric Company, dated February 9, 1965, was read to the Coaanission. Mr. Blayney suggested that the problem outlined in the letter could be solved by inserting on the General Plan map an abstract-type circle indicating some "General Industrial" use on the General Electric site, bu: leaving L-he majority of the site in the "Limited Industrial" category. 4. Community Facilities a. Dr. Ray Haskell, Superintendent, Amador High School District, re- quested that the high school site indicated on the Proposed General Plan, dated November 5, 1964, as being located immediately north of the Pine Avenue extension between Interstate Route 680 and Foothill Road, be relocated to a position immediately south of the Pine Avenue extension between Interstate Route 680 and Foothill Road. Dr. Haskell explained his request orally co the Commission, the explanation dealing basically with attendance areas and access from proposed attendance areas via Pine Avenue. b, Mr. Blayney and the City staff indicated that an ovezaight had resulted in the omission of one public park area on the Proposed General Plan dated November 5, 1964. ?'his park, already approved ac ~; part of Tract Nc. 2591, is to be located east of Hopyard Road and south of harvest Road, immediately adjacent tc Lhe approved churcF. site for Tract No. 2591, which is ~udicated as an Institutional. Use on the Proposed General Plan, and the approved swim cii,b site within this tract. Mr. Blayney and the City staff suggested tkie inclusion of this park on the Plan. as finally adopted. 5. Institutions No additional information submitted. 6. Asriculture No additional info=oration submitted.