Laserfiche WebLink
January 4, 1965, requested a one-year extension of Tract 2591 Tentative Map, which <br />area as yet has not been built upon due to the fact that this area moat remain idle <br />until the Arroyo del Valle Dam is completed. The communication dated February 1, <br />1965, requested that when the Planning Commission acted to extend the original <br />Tentative Map and any subsequent amendments to the original map, to include within <br />the extension an amendment which would increase the size of the proposed City park <br />from 1.6 to 2.0 acres. The letter further stated the size of the park should be <br />increased in order to properly lay out a play field. Mr. Fales asked the City <br />Attorney for his opinion as to whether the amendment should be accomplished prior <br />to the extension of the map or accomplished together with the extension. Mr. <br />Struthers recommended determining the matter of the park, followed by the extension. <br />Mr. Fales stated that the park would be in lieu of annexation fees. Cost breakdown <br />would be approximately $6,000 per acre, not counting streets; $0.30 per squaze foot <br />paving; $10.35 per lineal foot of street frontage. Calculations on two-acre park <br />would be $19,371.00. Annexation fees from Tracts 2678, 2680, etc. are estimated <br />to be $22,000.00 due the City, plus 30 acres for school totaling $6,000. During <br />the ensuing discussion, the feeling was that a two-acre park would be useful for <br />both the church and swim club. After reviewing the communication of February 1, <br />1965, from Mr. Front, and after further discussion by the Commission, upon motion <br />of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Rega, the following resolution was <br />adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present. <br />RESOLUTION N0. 386 <br />WHEREAS, the request of D & V Builders, Inc., 6000 Telegraph Avenue, Oakland, <br />for an amendment of the approved Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract <br />No. 2591, increasing the size of the public park from 1.6 to 2.0 scree, has <br />come before this Commission; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT <br />RESOLVID, that the Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract No. 2591, be amended <br />in order to increase the size of the public park indicated <br />thereon from 1.6 to 2.0 acres. <br />The Commission then discussed the one-year extension of Tentative Map for Tract No. <br />2591 requested to be extended to February 20, 1966. Following this discussion, upon <br />motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following <br />resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 387 <br />WHEREAS, the request of D 6< V Builders, Inc., 6000 Telegraph Avenue, <br />Oakland, for a one-year time extension from February 20, 1965, <br />for Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract No. 2591, has come before this <br />Commission; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT <br />RESOLVED, that the time allowed for the construction of improvements <br />within Tract No. 2591 is hereby extended to February 20, 1966. <br />At this point in the meeting, Chairman Landon called for a five minute recess. <br />Meeting resumed at 9:00 P.M. <br />The next item on the agenda was the amendment of Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract <br />No. 2659 (Rose Pointe) re: Street Names. The Tentative Map ae originally approved <br />did not apecity street names as the Developer had not yet chosen them. A list of <br />street names wan subsequently submitted to the City staff and cleared by Alameda <br />County. Names submitted are: Arlington Drive, Arlington Court, Dumont Court, <br />Hamilton Way, Lansing Court, Stanton Court, Randall Court and Hanover Court. After <br />discussion by the Comma^e.ica, upon motion of Commissioner Rega, seconded by Com- <br />missioner Antonini, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those <br />Commissioners present: <br />RESOLUTION N0, 388 <br />WHEREAS, amendment of Tentative Subdivision map, Tract No. 2659 (Rose Pointe) <br />re: Street Names, has come before this Coumnieaion; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'P <br />RESOLVED, that street names b:- approved as submitted. <br />