PC 02/24/65 - Laserfiche WebLink

M I N U T E S of THE .LE?'ZNG o£ THE PLA>I.VI?QG CO21t4TSSI0N Pleasanton, California February 24, 1965 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to ordez et 8:00 P.M„ on Wednesday, February 24, 19G5, by Chairman Landon. ROLL CALL showed the following: Present: Commissioners Antonini Lozano Rego Chairman Landon Secretary Fales Absent: Commissioner Johnston Upon motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, the minutes of the meeting of February 10, 1965, were approved ae presented by unanimous vote. Chairman Landon proceeded to a discussion of lend use and zoning; Stanley Boulevard East of Main Street (sequeat of Wallace Webb and Son). Mr. False, ingiving the staff report, explained that the matter was referred to Livingston and Bleyney for report and recommendation by letter of February 3, 1965. The reply from Livingston and Blayney, dated February 17, 1965, was read by Mr. Falea, which constituted the staff report and which stated that an automobile body repair shop would not be permitted on the subject site under preaenL zoning, and would not be desirable on the site is any event. The appropriate zoning would be C-G, General Commercial, for this kind of use; however, the shop would be inconsiateat with the General Plan and with the Central District Development Plan, and, therefore, rezoning to the C-G District also would not be appropriate in this location. However, offices or retail stores on the subject site would be consistent with the proposed General Ylan. The report stated further that any commercial development on the pzoperty should be arranged so that access to the buildings can be converted to the Del Valle Parkway in the future, and that a variance might be considered. Mr. John Codd, who was present in the audience, Baked for a clarification of "major" and "minor" repair. City Attorney Struthers defined major repairs ae moat body work, and minor repairs as something heavier than tune-ups. In reply to further questions by Mr. Codd, Chairman Landon advised the applicant to make formal application for any future consideration. Mr. Fales read the letter of inquiry from Mr. William F. Webb dated January 8, 1965, on the basis of which the staff requested a report from the City's coneultanta, and stated that ae of the present time no formal application hoe been made. The next item on the agenda was a request for one-year time extension; Tract No. 2595 (Amador Eatatea). Mr. Alan Campbell stated that the final map has been filed on two portions of Tract No. 2595, erd this request is for a time extension for the remainder of the subject tract. After consideration by the Commission, upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: RESOLUT~fON NO. 391 WHEREAS, the request for a one-year time extension; Tract No. 2595 (Amador Estates) hoe come before Chia Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ABSOLVED, that the City Planning Commission hereby reco~enda to the City Council that the above-named extension to March 11, 1966, be granted. The next item on the agenda was a referral from Alameda County re: Request fos Catholic Cemetery, Vallecitos Road, which matter was continued from February 10, 1965. Mr. Falea explained that the subject site is in en area shown ae law density